26.01.2013 Views

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE<br />

CHAPTER 11<br />

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL<br />

Increased official <strong>and</strong> public concern about the presence of fungicide<br />

residues in foods, <strong>and</strong> the development by pathogens of resistance to<br />

major fungicides, are two important reasons for the enhanced interest in<br />

the possibility of using biological control as an alternative, non-chemical<br />

means of decay suppression.<br />

The term 'TDiological control" or ^iDiocontrol" refers to the use of<br />

naturally found microorganisms which antagonize the post<strong>harvest</strong><br />

pathogens we wish to suppress. Antagonism between microorganisms is<br />

a ubiquitous phenomenon involving fungi (including yeasts) <strong>and</strong> bacteria<br />

which naturally inhabit the soil <strong>and</strong> the surfaces of various plant organs<br />

(Blakeman <strong>and</strong> Fokkema, 1982; Fokkema <strong>and</strong> van den Heuvel, 1986;<br />

Andrews, 1992). It is assumed that biocontrol of plant <strong>diseases</strong> occurs<br />

naturally on aerial plant surfaces <strong>and</strong> may be one of the main reasons<br />

why crops are protected to some extent during their cultivation (Droby et<br />

al., 1996).<br />

One of the approaches to the isolation of antagonistic microorganisms<br />

for controlling post<strong>harvest</strong> <strong>diseases</strong> is through the promotion <strong>and</strong><br />

management of natural epiphytic antagonists, already present on fruit<br />

<strong>and</strong> vegetable surfaces. Pre<strong>harvest</strong> pesticide application <strong>and</strong> various<br />

post<strong>harvest</strong> treatments, such as fungicide <strong>and</strong> wax sprays, washes <strong>and</strong><br />

dips, can greatly affect the resident microflora, both qualitatively <strong>and</strong><br />

quantitatively. It has been commonly observed that the common practice<br />

of post<strong>harvest</strong> washing of <strong>harvest</strong>ed <strong>fruits</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vegetables</strong> to obtain clean<br />

produce, may affect the microbial populations by removal of naturally<br />

occurring microorganisms. Fungicides may change the epiphytic<br />

microflora by affecting microorganisms other than the pathogens against<br />

which they are directed. These changes can, in turn, affect the pathogen<br />

resistance of the host. Such practices could possibly be modified to<br />

promote beneficial antagonistic microflora (Wilson <strong>and</strong> Wisniewski,<br />

1989). To manipulate epiphytic microbial populations of <strong>fruits</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>vegetables</strong> effectively, in order to control decay, information is needed on<br />

their ecology. Spurr et al. (1991) suggested that emphasis be placed on<br />

studying the impact of the environment on the microflora <strong>and</strong> that of<br />

pre<strong>harvest</strong>, <strong>harvest</strong> <strong>and</strong> post<strong>harvest</strong> activities on disease development.<br />

http://arab2000.forumpro.fr

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!