26.01.2013 Views

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE<br />

64 <strong>Post</strong><strong>harvest</strong> Diseases of Fruits <strong>and</strong> Vegetables<br />

25°C. However, in spite of the differences in the amounts of toxin<br />

produced, no significant differences in pathogenicity were recorded<br />

among fungal strains, as determined by lesion diameter on each of the<br />

<strong>fruits</strong>. In other words, no correlation was found between patulin<br />

production <strong>and</strong> disease development. Even strains that did not produce<br />

patulin at 0° <strong>and</strong> 25°C infected the <strong>fruits</strong> to the same degree as strains<br />

capable of growth <strong>and</strong> patulin production at these temperatures.<br />

Furthermore, patulin production was totally inhibited when inoculated<br />

apples were held in a 3%C02/2%02 atmosphere (25''C), although the level<br />

of infection under the controlled atmosphere conditions was fairly high,<br />

reaching 70% of that of the control.<br />

Non-host-specific toxins are generally acknowledged to be an element<br />

of virulence for many bacteria as well. Most of the known bacterial toxins<br />

are produced by various pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae (Scheffer,<br />

1983; Gross, 1991). These toxins constitute a family of structurally<br />

diverse compounds, usually peptide in nature, that, in some cases,<br />

display wide-spectrum antibiotic activity. Progress has been made in<br />

identifsdng gene clusters associated with toxin production, <strong>and</strong> there is<br />

some evidence that toxin genes may be activated in response to specific<br />

plant signals (Gross, 1991).<br />

C. DETOXIFICATION OF HOST DEFENSE COMPOUNDS<br />

BY PATHOGENS<br />

In addition to the activities of cell-wall-degrading enzymes <strong>and</strong> toxins<br />

of the pathogen, the ability to degrade plant chemical defense<br />

compounds, such as the tomato a-tomatine, has also been discussed as a<br />

potential pathogenicity determinant (Staples <strong>and</strong> Mayer, 1995).<br />

The saponin, a-tomatine is a steroidal glyco-alkaloid that occurs in<br />

many plant species <strong>and</strong> provides a preformed barrier to fungal invasion<br />

(Verhoeff <strong>and</strong> Liem, 1975; Osbourn, 1996). It is found in all parts of<br />

tomato plants but is especially plentiful in the peel of green tomato <strong>fruits</strong><br />

(see the chapter on Host Protection <strong>and</strong> Defense Mechanisms -<br />

Preformed Inhibitory Compounds). The toxicity of a-tomatine to fungi is<br />

due to its ability to interact with membrane sterols, <strong>and</strong> thus cause<br />

membrane leakage (Fenwick et al., 1992; Quidde et al., 1998).<br />

Tomato pathogens have developed two primary strategies to overcome<br />

this chemical defense (Osbourn et al., 1994): either they are resistant to<br />

http://arab2000.forumpro.fr

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!