26.01.2013 Views

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

Post harvest diseases fruits and vegetables - Xavier University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE FREEDOM PALESTINE<br />

Biological Control 233<br />

In fact, post<strong>harvest</strong> decay control in pear <strong>fruits</strong> by the yeasts,<br />

Rhodotorula <strong>and</strong> Cryptococcus has been demonstrated following both<br />

field sprays (Benbow <strong>and</strong> Sugar, 1999) <strong>and</strong> post<strong>harvest</strong> application<br />

(Ch<strong>and</strong>-Goyal <strong>and</strong> Spotts, 1996a). Similarly, the efficiency of yeasts of<br />

the genera Pichia <strong>and</strong> Hanseniaspora in controlling Rhizopus <strong>and</strong><br />

Botrytis decay in grapes has been expressed following both sprays in the<br />

vineyard prior to <strong>harvest</strong>, <strong>and</strong> dipping of <strong>harvest</strong>ed fruit in the<br />

antagonist yeast cell suspension (Ben Arie et al., 1991).<br />

C. MODE OF ACTION OF THE ANTAGONIST<br />

Elucidation of the mechanisms by which antagonists inhibit<br />

post<strong>harvest</strong> pathogens is important for the development of a more<br />

reliable procedure for the effective application of known antagonists <strong>and</strong><br />

for providing a rationale for the selection of more effective antagonists<br />

(Wilson <strong>and</strong> Wisniewski, 1989). Several modes of action have been<br />

suggested to explain the biocontrol activity of antagonistic microorganisms<br />

(Droby et al., 1992; Droby <strong>and</strong> Chalutz, 1994; Wilson et al., 1994):<br />

(a) the secretion of antibiotic compounds;<br />

(b) competition for nutrients at the wound site;<br />

(c) direct effect of the antagonist or enzymes secreted<br />

by it, on the pathogen;<br />

(d) induction of host defense mechanisms.<br />

(a) The secretion of antibiotic compounds by the antagonist.<br />

Examples of microorganisms which inhibit the pathogen via the<br />

production of antibiotics are the bacteria. Bacillus subtilis <strong>and</strong><br />

Pseudomonas cepacia. The early study of Gutter <strong>and</strong> Littauer (1953 )<br />

found B, subtilis able to inhibit the development in culture of the main<br />

pathogens of <strong>harvest</strong>ed citrus <strong>fruits</strong>. More than 30 years later, it was<br />

found that this antagonist was effective against fungal development in<br />

citrus fruit (Singh <strong>and</strong> Deverall, 1984) <strong>and</strong> against Monilinia fructicola<br />

in peaches <strong>and</strong> cherries (Pusey <strong>and</strong> Wilson, 1984; Utkhede <strong>and</strong> Sholberg,<br />

1986). Analytical tests of the antibiotic substance secreted by an active<br />

isolate of B. subtilis indicated the presence of iturins, which are cyclic<br />

peptides made of seven a acids <strong>and</strong> one p acid. They are characterized by<br />

a wide antifungal spectrum including fungi pathogenic to man <strong>and</strong><br />

plants (Pusey, 1991; Gueldner et al., 1988). It is interesting to note that<br />

http://arab2000.forumpro.fr

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!