29.01.2013 Views

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> the section ―On the Paralogisms <strong>of</strong> Pure Reason.‖ In the former Kant addresses not<br />

only the function <strong>of</strong> apperception as ground <strong>of</strong> all representations, but also, briefly, its<br />

nature. In the latter, Kant addresses <strong>in</strong> what way it is legitimate to claim that one can<br />

cognize the ―I‖ <strong>of</strong> apperception; it elucidates the extent to which it is possible to<br />

legitimately take the ―I‖ as Object with the cognitive resources available to f<strong>in</strong>ite rational<br />

be<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> subject's act <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g itself <strong>in</strong>to an Object is identified explicitly <strong>in</strong> these<br />

passages from the Op as self-consciousness (―conscientia sui ipsius,‖ ―Bewustseyn<br />

me<strong>in</strong>er Selbst,‖ ―apperception,‖ or ―ich b<strong>in</strong> mir me<strong>in</strong>er selbst bewust‖). Follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

lead <strong>of</strong> what Kant writes <strong>in</strong> the ―Deduction,‖ one can take this to mean that <strong>in</strong> so far as<br />

the subject is conscious <strong>of</strong> its own <strong>in</strong>volvement as ground <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> its possible<br />

representations, it is grasp<strong>in</strong>g itself or the ―I‖ <strong>in</strong> this conscious thought. In other words,<br />

the subject's act <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g itself as the source <strong>of</strong> the necessary unity between itself <strong>and</strong><br />

all its representations is congruent with an act <strong>of</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g itself as ―Object,‖ even if what is<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g taken as object <strong>of</strong> thought is ultimately noth<strong>in</strong>g but a designation (―I‖) <strong>of</strong> its own<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g as a unify<strong>in</strong>g function (―gehört zur Logik,‖ ―Vorstellung durch Begriffe oder das<br />

Denken,‖ or ―blos logischer Act ist‖).<br />

This account turns on the dist<strong>in</strong>ction discussed <strong>in</strong> the previous section between<br />

discursive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuition; s<strong>in</strong>ce for a f<strong>in</strong>ite rational be<strong>in</strong>g cognition is<br />

possible only if <strong>in</strong>tuition is given to it, the subject is limited at the level <strong>of</strong> apperception<br />

alone to a mere th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> itself by means <strong>of</strong> the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, which means that the<br />

thought <strong>of</strong> this ―I‖ is itself empty <strong>of</strong> all <strong>in</strong>tuition. In §25, Kant writes: ―...<strong>in</strong> the synthetic<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al unity <strong>of</strong> apperception, I am conscious <strong>of</strong> myself, not as I appear to myself, nor as<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!