The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

objectification and ―I am‖ as Verbum. This is because the latter are transposed into this
first moment of the ontological level, itself understood as a) the subject‘s positing of itself
as an Object – projected as the unity of the multiple of given intuition, formal and
material; and b) the potentiality of such projection – the action that brings the projection
forth and enables the affirmation of the actuality of the subject as Object. At the
ontological level, the logical I as Verbum or copula is now directed beyond its mere
discursive function and character of unity in thought alone and towards a field of intuition
that gives content to the empty notion of Object of pure apperception. It will thus endow
the ―I‖ with the potential for serving as copula of an assertoric judgment, or proposition
with synthetic content. This self-position is encapsulated by the expression: Ich bin [as
Verbum] existierend. Thus, unlike the purely logical self-objectification and Verbum,
spontaneity is now conceived in it‘s a priori effective function with respect to the
subject‘s self-representation with intuitive content, and from a larger perspective, in
behuf der Erfahrung.
While the Act der Spontaneität runs through the other two ontological moments
(receptivity and reciprocity), when discussed on its own terms, its particularity comes to
the fore. One way to see this is to give order to differentiated forms of apperception in
terms of the level and nature of the subject‘s determination or determinability in thought
and/or intuition: ―I am thinking‖ and ―I am existing‖ as well as ―I am (in) space and
time‖ and ―I am (in) the world‖ (the latter two will be subject to analysis later on). Here
is a passage from the doctrine where anticipating the shortcomings of the first of these
expressions, Kant anticipates the meaning of the second:
(Sum)[:] copula of a possible judgment; not yet a judgment,
since for this a predicate would be necessary (apprehension
145