The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> both the two level structure <strong>and</strong> manifold <strong>of</strong> elements that are at play <strong>in</strong><br />
the doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> self-<strong>posit<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
Already present at the <strong>in</strong>ception <strong>of</strong> his critical philosophy, Kant‘s dualistic model<br />
<strong>of</strong> the subject breaks with the <strong>in</strong>itial framework <strong>of</strong> the Cartesian subjectivist turn <strong>in</strong> the<br />
history <strong>of</strong> Western philosophy. 96 Both <strong>of</strong> these frameworks shift away from a tradition<br />
that <strong>in</strong> its primary concern with a science <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g assumes a simple identity between<br />
thought <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> its stead <strong>in</strong>troduce the ―I‖ (cogito) as that which functions as<br />
the locus <strong>of</strong> any identity relationship between thought <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g. However, while <strong>in</strong><br />
Descartes the self-conscious ―I‖ exhibits an immediate self-referential relationship<br />
between th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> itself as the be<strong>in</strong>g that is perform<strong>in</strong>g this th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g (cogito, sum), <strong>in</strong><br />
Kant the ―I‖ conta<strong>in</strong>s an irreducible split that denies the possibility for such immediacy.<br />
In Kant‘s critical theory <strong>of</strong> subjectivity, the ―I‖ that is conscious <strong>of</strong> itself is a thought that<br />
is always already a ―tw<strong>of</strong>old I;‖ echo<strong>in</strong>g the earlier cited schematic <strong>in</strong> the doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> self-<br />
<strong>posit<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, Kant notes <strong>in</strong> the Preischrift über die Fortschritte der Metaphysik (henceforth<br />
Fort) (1974) that this ―I‖ conta<strong>in</strong>s ―the I as subject, <strong>and</strong> the I as Object.‖ While Kant<br />
affirms there that this is a ―fact‖ that cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed, he describes the former ―I as<br />
subject‖ <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> a ―logical I as a priori representation‖ <strong>and</strong> the latter ―I as Object‖ <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> a ―psychological I as empirical consciousness.‖ 97 <strong>Self</strong>-consciousness with<strong>in</strong> this<br />
96 Baum, M. ―Subjekt und Person bei Kant,‖ <strong>in</strong> Transzendenz und Existenz. Idealistische<br />
Grndlagen und modern Perspektiven des transzendentalen Gedankens. Wolfgang Janke<br />
zum 70. Geburstag, ed. Manfred Baum <strong>and</strong> Klaus Hammacher, Amnsterdam/Atlanta, GA<br />
2001, 3. Presented as Hegel‘s <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the Cartesian turn <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong><br />
philosophy, while simultaneously argu<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>Kant's</strong> subjectivism must not be easily<br />
conflated the latter. Hegel appears to do this as he mentions Fichte, a purported follower<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kant, as a more developed <strong>in</strong>stantiation <strong>of</strong> the Cartesian tradition.<br />
97 Ak: 20:270. Heath, 362 (translation modified). Allison translates ―Ich‖ as ―self‖ <strong>and</strong><br />
70