29.01.2013 Views

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

directed to the elements which are found <strong>in</strong> it, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> which it is<br />

composed. 197<br />

Like <strong>in</strong> the former passage, there are activities <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d normally associated with<br />

bodily functions—acts <strong>of</strong> vision or touch—that are here ―only an <strong>in</strong>tuition <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d.‖<br />

Thus the feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> see<strong>in</strong>g, touch<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> walk<strong>in</strong>g is a form <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>stantiates<br />

<strong>in</strong>tuition. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the present participle <strong>in</strong> both <strong>of</strong> these passages <strong>in</strong>dicates that what<br />

one feels or <strong>of</strong> which one is <strong>in</strong>tuitively conscious is simultaneous to the state <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

This is different from it be<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>stance a recollection <strong>of</strong> a past event; <strong>in</strong> the latter, the<br />

consciousness representation <strong>of</strong> an event that has already taken place is removed from a<br />

case <strong>of</strong> undergo<strong>in</strong>g a feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> an event at a present moment. It appears also to be<br />

immediate; it is one <strong>and</strong> the same with its experience <strong>and</strong>, as such, there is for <strong>in</strong>stance no<br />

need for the use <strong>of</strong> propositional form, which would be necessary if the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

were at play. In this way, feel<strong>in</strong>gs also appear to fulfill the two basic characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tuition.<br />

After this elucidation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuition <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> both its methodological character<br />

<strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stantiation <strong>of</strong> what it may be like as an activity <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d—feel<strong>in</strong>g—it is<br />

important to return to the question that <strong>in</strong>itiated this discussion: ―What about one‘s<br />

ability to recognize through all forms <strong>of</strong> mental awareness the constant presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cogito (e.g., even <strong>in</strong> a state <strong>of</strong> radical doubt) allows one to posit that one exits?‖ Another<br />

look at the first passage quoted <strong>in</strong> this section will <strong>in</strong>troduce the resources necessary to<br />

answer this question. In the first passage there are three overarch<strong>in</strong>g aspects or moments<br />

to what Descartes is here describ<strong>in</strong>g as th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. First, by th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g he underst<strong>and</strong>s ―all<br />

197 Descartes, 155. Vol. 2<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!