The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MAN that, <strong>in</strong>deed, no science understood <strong>in</strong> the strong sense <strong>of</strong> the term can result from<br />
the <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner sense. Not only can there be no ―rational psychology,‖ but<br />
there can also be no doctr<strong>in</strong>e that start<strong>in</strong>g from an empirical concept, can lead to an<br />
apodictic k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> a priori cognition, which is <strong>in</strong>deed the case for outer sense. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the MAN, en empirical concept such as matter can be analyzed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the table<br />
<strong>of</strong> categories (thus synthetically) <strong>and</strong>, on the basis <strong>of</strong> this, its a priori necessary rules <strong>of</strong><br />
schematization can be shown to apply to this concept's pure part. <strong>The</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> a<br />
metaphysics <strong>of</strong> nature are thus laid. But, <strong>in</strong> contrast to this, any attempt at develop<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
science <strong>of</strong> empirical psychology will (qua legitimacy) qualify merely as natural<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the soul, where mathematics is not applicable, for <strong>in</strong>ner sense as one<br />
dimensional <strong>and</strong> successive have no spatial reference from which it can be determ<strong>in</strong>ate.<br />
Not only can any science <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner sense never atta<strong>in</strong> synthetic a priori knowledge,<br />
but psychology as a practice <strong>of</strong> observation is <strong>in</strong>credibly hard – <strong>in</strong>ner sense is <strong>in</strong>credibly<br />
susceptible to the environment <strong>and</strong> bodily <strong>in</strong>fluences, <strong>in</strong>trospection can lead to<br />
revisionism <strong>and</strong>, for Kant, engag<strong>in</strong>g with it for too long can be damag<strong>in</strong>g. Indeed, the<br />
difficulty is such that Kant goes as far as to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Metaphysik der Sitten<br />
(henceforth MS) that when it comes to our own evaluation <strong>of</strong> the moral worth <strong>of</strong> an action<br />
– accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>dividual‘s real reasons for hav<strong>in</strong>g chosen one action over another – a<br />
person can never truly be sure whether he or she has acted morally. Thus, even if we as<br />
rational be<strong>in</strong>gs may be certa<strong>in</strong> as to the truth <strong>of</strong> a metaphysics <strong>of</strong> morals, our ability to<br />
judge ourselves is always susceptible to a condition <strong>of</strong> not truly know<strong>in</strong>g. Thus, despite<br />
the fact that Kant leaves the door open for an empirical psychology (as opposed to a<br />
rational one), the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>and</strong> value <strong>of</strong> the knowledge that it would provide towards<br />
175