The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

Recommendations

Info

The analytic and ontological parts in the Selbstsetzungslehre are furthermore framed within a discourse that articulates them as being for the purpose of experience or, in Kant's words, zum behuf der Erfahrung. In this respect, they can be situated within the Op's larger project of finding legitimate grounds for the possibility of a science of physics understood as a system of empirical cognitions; a system that in the doctrine is articulated as nothing other than a single experience. In addition, without stepping out of this framework, one finds that three ontological Actus also introduce a genetic account of the individuation of the Kantian subject—until now known theoretically in terms of the constitutive elements of a subjective universality—as participant in a dynamical unbounded world of empeiria. The character of this empeiria as such is the result of the differential relations in and among the fields of determinability brought forth by the subject's Act der Receptivität. Because for the purpose of the making of experience these fields must be essentially capable of being given for them to become determined, it is also necessary that the subject to which they are given posit itself through an Act der Spontaneität. It does so in two senses. In this latter Act, the subject affirms itself simultaneously as these fields of determinability and in them; it is concurrently the source of the conditions that constitute the character of what can be given and it is positioned within these conditions in order to come to the encounter of that which is given. In positing itself as such, the subject confirms and configures its own basic cognitive character as source and limit of as well as subjection to the spatio-temporal, dynamic and unbounded world of empeiria. The Kantian model of the subject that thing in itself, the acts of spontaneity and receptivity, and (through their combination to unity) the act of reciprocity – […].‖ Original: Die reine Anschauung a priori enhält die actus der Sponteneität und Receptivität und durch verbindung derselben zur Einheit der Act der Reciprocität […]. (Ak: 22:28. Förster 172). Cf. Ak: 22:31. Förster, 173. 78
functions as ground to a universal system of philosophy is now presented in its particularity as well. Based on his earlier critical work, the Kantian subject is known in the last instance, at least from a theoretical point of view, as nothing more than a set of functions that in their different relations constitute the possibilities for cognition as well as aesthetic and teleological judgment. However, for these functions to be actually exhibited as the nature or principle of the latter, it is necessary that mental powers [Kräfte] corresponding to these functions be animated. The instigation or arousal of these mental forces occurs, moreover, in their encounter with the given. The positing required for this encounter to take place points to an unlocalizable space and is in this way a dislocated event of sorts. On the one hand, this unlocalizable space is where the subject posits itself a priori as the bearer of the conditions for the possibility for its experience; and on the other hand, where the subject is subjected to something over which it has no control. This locus of the occurrence of the self-positing of the subject in the Selbstsetzungslehre is sensibility, which considered in isolation from the imagination (qua faculty of sensibility, not of understanding) is the seat of the virtuality of the ―I.‖ In this sense, sensibility is the critical sphere of the deployment of the powers of the mind; it is the ―blinded‖ and ―disorienting‖ temporal, spatial, and dynamical relations, where in the different repetitive acts of reason, understanding, judgment, and imagination, the subject individuates itself temporally, spatially and materially in and from a whole that precedes its parts. In sensibility the ―I‖ sustains its conscious existence as Verbum in the cognition of itself, of objects, and other subjects, indeed, even in the feeling of pleasure and pain. 79
Page 1 and 2:
The Doctrine of Self-positing and R
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract of the Dissertation The Do
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Abbreviations vi Preface v
Page 7 and 8:
Preface The interest in the Opus po
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments I am in the debt of
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction The Selbstsetzungslehr
Page 13 and 14:
of receptivity‖ reveals also the
Page 15 and 16:
enables thinkers in the twenty firs
Page 17 and 18:
form of ―principles of synthesis
Page 19 and 20:
a transition that has its own ―sp
Page 21 and 22:
the English language literature tha
Page 23 and 24:
his account was circular. As Först
Page 25 and 26:
fascicle written by Kant between 18
Page 27 and 28:
the doctrine of self-positing attem
Page 29 and 30:
preemptively with this retrospectiv
Page 31 and 32:
meaning of its particular relations
Page 33 and 34:
ii. a. Ontological Proof In its com
Page 35 and 36:
ecause the only operative rule for
Page 37 and 38: In the context of the BDG, the natu
Page 39 and 40: 3. It is unconditionally impossible
Page 41 and 42: . We know that a condition for inne
Page 43 and 44: Realerklährung - an explanation of
Page 45 and 46: ii. b. Setzung‘s Function as Posi
Page 47 and 48: Negation can also result from chang
Page 49 and 50: ii. Kritik der reinen Vernunft ii.
Page 51 and 52: foreclosed. This is precisely what
Page 53 and 54: none of this is particularly new. N
Page 55 and 56: elations of thoroughgoing determina
Page 57 and 58: that exhibits it must share in the
Page 59 and 60: of this ideal and its final personi
Page 61 and 62: it perceives only its effects. In a
Page 63 and 64: category causality in the second an
Page 65 and 66: Just as time functions as the form
Page 67 and 68: spontaneous nature. Or perhaps it r
Page 69 and 70: points to the fact that in the act
Page 71 and 72: latter (as for the other dynamical
Page 73 and 74: unity is expressed. In the second a
Page 75 and 76: Kant‘s new transcendental idealis
Page 77 and 78: idealize what can be claimed to be.
Page 79 and 80: The structure in the schematic of t
Page 81 and 82: critical model entails thus the sub
Page 83 and 84: continuous reiteration of the most
Page 85 and 86: [machen] of experience with the sou
Page 87: and not actuality. 103 These fields
Page 91 and 92: appearance, phenomenon, and noumeno
Page 93 and 94: Handschrift, when he writes: The mi
Page 95 and 96: thought. While the spirit of the cr
Page 97 and 98: faculties of representation in ligh
Page 99 and 100: particularly in their presence, uni
Page 101 and 102: knower to thin an objective represe
Page 103 and 104: doctrine, the name is oftentimes qu
Page 105 and 106: to intuition. This status brings to
Page 107 and 108: Chapter Three: The Analytic Level 1
Page 109 and 110: ―Paralogisms‖ section. 136 Desp
Page 111 and 112: the Selbstsetzungslehre. In this re
Page 113 and 114: Not being able to be thought by the
Page 115 and 116: This connection between the single
Page 117 and 118: it concerns the possibility of the
Page 119 and 120: perspective of its relation to the
Page 121 and 122: apperception and b) the synthetic o
Page 123 and 124: and the section ―On the Paralogis
Page 125 and 126: synthetic determination of its intu
Page 127 and 128: on the possibility of attaching the
Page 129 and 130: distinguished from this ―I‖). 1
Page 131 and 132: object. 177 The consciousness of my
Page 133 and 134: doctrine. One finds, in fact, that
Page 135 and 136: perspective, contained analytically
Page 137 and 138: an inference: [...] 186 The first s
Page 139 and 140:
this follows from the fact that for
Page 141 and 142:
feeling can be said to be a form of
Page 143 and 144:
that of which we are conscious as o
Page 145 and 146:
true, the nature of intuition concr
Page 147 and 148:
This formulation of the ―I am‖
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter Four: The Ontological Level
Page 151 and 152:
of identity, the analytic containme
Page 153 and 154:
there Kant nevertheless asks: ―An
Page 155 and 156:
objectification and ―I am‖ as V
Page 157 and 158:
The first synthetic act of consciou
Page 159 and 160:
introducing a different field of de
Page 161 and 162:
where the earlier indeterminate emp
Page 163 and 164:
What is given first to the power of
Page 165 and 166:
epresentation that was given prior
Page 167 and 168:
outside itself, which it can then d
Page 169 and 170:
ground that can accommodate the exp
Page 171 and 172:
These passages by no means say the
Page 173 and 174:
sensible‖ (as Deleuze would phras
Page 175 and 176:
schematization. What that is like w
Page 177 and 178:
from which the ―I think‖ gains
Page 179 and 180:
The path taken to arrive at a basic
Page 181 and 182:
As seen in chapter four, the relati
Page 183 and 184:
In so far as the Selbstsetzungslehr
Page 185 and 186:
MAN that, indeed, no science unders
Page 187 and 188:
medical doctors, educators, and phy
Page 189 and 190:
the grounding of the human sciences
Page 191 and 192:
______ ―Metaphysical Foundations
Page 193 and 194:
S. Harris. Revised Edition. Indiana
Page 195 and 196:
Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago, U
Page 197:
187
show all

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?