The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

Recommendations

Info

Natural Science to Physics‖ and the second ―The System of Pure Philosophy in its Context.‖ 24 And Adickes, who was responsible for the dating of the fascicles, for example, also strongly emphasized the two distinct parts of the text; the first dealing mostly with natural sciences and metaphysics of nature, while the second presented a doctrine of self-positing, which he then subdivides into different themes (i.e., self- affection; thing in itself). 25 This general two-part vision of the text by no means accounts for why one section has been studied more than the other, but it certainly opens up a door to such an interpretative tendency. It is also worthwhile noting that, when the second part of the Op is treated, moreover, some authors tend either to just do lip service or to jump over the doctrine of self-positing to focus on the big systematic repercussions of Kant‘s last reflections—and in doing so tying it to the conclusions drawn with respect to significance of the ―gap‖ and the standing of the ―ether deductions. This is accomplished by interpreting the very last 24 Prieto, L. ―Invitación al studio del O.p de Kant,‖ in Journal Alpha omega; revista di filosofia e teologia dell‘ Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2000), 511. 25 This is not to say that Adickes privileged the first part over the second. According to him, since the first part dealt with the physics and chemistry of Kant‘s time, it was of no value to the contemporary scientist or philosopher of science; his position on the second part is more complex, as he thought of the doctrine of self-positing as the result of Kant falling into the ―positing mania‖ of the time. As a result, he simply rescues what he saw as further support of his theory of double affection, basically Kant‘s supposedly rearticulation or clarification of the status of the ―thing in itself.‖ Despite all of this, Adickes' general evaluation of much of the O.p is encapsulated in disparaging remarks, such as it being ―uncritical and senile transgressions with respect to favorite opinions [―Unkritische, senile Nachgiebigkeit gegen Lienlingsmeinungen‖],‖ or mere ―airy speculations [Luftige Spekulationen].‖ None of this, however, negates Adickes enormous contributions to the scholarly understanding of the text. Adickes, E. Kants Opus postumum, dargestellt und beurteilt. Berlin, Reuther & Reichard, 1920, 394 and 590. Cf. Prieto, L. ―Invitación al studio del O.p de Kant,‖ in Journal Alpha omega; revista di filosofia e teologia dell‘ Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2000). 14
fascicle written by Kant between 1800 and 1803. Kant‘s reflections in these pages are, one could say, at the macro level; one finds here formulations of his system of transcendental philosophy as a whole. Because fascicle i is in its character the most scattered, incomplete, and schematic (e.g., there are what appear as possible titles for either the Op or perhaps his philosophical position in general; one finds the names of other thinkers – such as Spinoza, Schelling, Lichtenberg – as placeholders for philosophical positions through which Kant appears to be situating his own; etc..) it has proven to be a fecund source for provocative interpretations of the ultimate significance of the Op. For instance, some have claimed that Kant situates his work within Schelling‘s ―System of Transcendental Idealism‖ (e.g., Tüschling) or, more broadly speaking, within a kind of ―Spinozism‖ (e.g., Edwards), both of which would challenge some of the most important tenets of Kant's earlier vision of his critical and transcendental philosophy. However, although not always found contained in a single book, more holistic approaches to the interpretation of the Op can be pieced together in the literature written in other languages; for instance in Spanish (e.g., Duque, Pietro), Italian (e.g., Matheau), French (e.g., Ferrero) and German (e.g., Förster). References to the Op can also be found in the works of now canonical authors of the 20 th Century, such as Heidegger and Foucault on the topics of being, finitude and subjectivity, or Deleuze on the change in the status of space over time as forms of intuition. Ultimately, the differences in interpretative paths may suggest that the source of the asymmetry in the English language literature and the tendencies and uses elsewhere result from different philosophical traditions and cultural specificities (e.g., a preference for epistemology in Anglo tradition 15
Page 1 and 2: The Doctrine of Self-positing and R
Page 3 and 4: Abstract of the Dissertation The Do
Page 5 and 6: Contents Abbreviations vi Preface v
Page 7 and 8: Preface The interest in the Opus po
Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgments I am in the debt of
Page 11 and 12: Introduction The Selbstsetzungslehr
Page 13 and 14: of receptivity‖ reveals also the
Page 15 and 16: enables thinkers in the twenty firs
Page 17 and 18: form of ―principles of synthesis
Page 19 and 20: a transition that has its own ―sp
Page 21 and 22: the English language literature tha
Page 23: his account was circular. As Först
Page 27 and 28: the doctrine of self-positing attem
Page 29 and 30: preemptively with this retrospectiv
Page 31 and 32: meaning of its particular relations
Page 33 and 34: ii. a. Ontological Proof In its com
Page 35 and 36: ecause the only operative rule for
Page 37 and 38: In the context of the BDG, the natu
Page 39 and 40: 3. It is unconditionally impossible
Page 41 and 42: . We know that a condition for inne
Page 43 and 44: Realerklährung - an explanation of
Page 45 and 46: ii. b. Setzung‘s Function as Posi
Page 47 and 48: Negation can also result from chang
Page 49 and 50: ii. Kritik der reinen Vernunft ii.
Page 51 and 52: foreclosed. This is precisely what
Page 53 and 54: none of this is particularly new. N
Page 55 and 56: elations of thoroughgoing determina
Page 57 and 58: that exhibits it must share in the
Page 59 and 60: of this ideal and its final personi
Page 61 and 62: it perceives only its effects. In a
Page 63 and 64: category causality in the second an
Page 65 and 66: Just as time functions as the form
Page 67 and 68: spontaneous nature. Or perhaps it r
Page 69 and 70: points to the fact that in the act
Page 71 and 72: latter (as for the other dynamical
Page 73 and 74: unity is expressed. In the second a
Page 75 and 76:
Kant‘s new transcendental idealis
Page 77 and 78:
idealize what can be claimed to be.
Page 79 and 80:
The structure in the schematic of t
Page 81 and 82:
critical model entails thus the sub
Page 83 and 84:
continuous reiteration of the most
Page 85 and 86:
[machen] of experience with the sou
Page 87 and 88:
and not actuality. 103 These fields
Page 89 and 90:
functions as ground to a universal
Page 91 and 92:
appearance, phenomenon, and noumeno
Page 93 and 94:
Handschrift, when he writes: The mi
Page 95 and 96:
thought. While the spirit of the cr
Page 97 and 98:
faculties of representation in ligh
Page 99 and 100:
particularly in their presence, uni
Page 101 and 102:
knower to thin an objective represe
Page 103 and 104:
doctrine, the name is oftentimes qu
Page 105 and 106:
to intuition. This status brings to
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter Three: The Analytic Level 1
Page 109 and 110:
―Paralogisms‖ section. 136 Desp
Page 111 and 112:
the Selbstsetzungslehre. In this re
Page 113 and 114:
Not being able to be thought by the
Page 115 and 116:
This connection between the single
Page 117 and 118:
it concerns the possibility of the
Page 119 and 120:
perspective of its relation to the
Page 121 and 122:
apperception and b) the synthetic o
Page 123 and 124:
and the section ―On the Paralogis
Page 125 and 126:
synthetic determination of its intu
Page 127 and 128:
on the possibility of attaching the
Page 129 and 130:
distinguished from this ―I‖). 1
Page 131 and 132:
object. 177 The consciousness of my
Page 133 and 134:
doctrine. One finds, in fact, that
Page 135 and 136:
perspective, contained analytically
Page 137 and 138:
an inference: [...] 186 The first s
Page 139 and 140:
this follows from the fact that for
Page 141 and 142:
feeling can be said to be a form of
Page 143 and 144:
that of which we are conscious as o
Page 145 and 146:
true, the nature of intuition concr
Page 147 and 148:
This formulation of the ―I am‖
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter Four: The Ontological Level
Page 151 and 152:
of identity, the analytic containme
Page 153 and 154:
there Kant nevertheless asks: ―An
Page 155 and 156:
objectification and ―I am‖ as V
Page 157 and 158:
The first synthetic act of consciou
Page 159 and 160:
introducing a different field of de
Page 161 and 162:
where the earlier indeterminate emp
Page 163 and 164:
What is given first to the power of
Page 165 and 166:
epresentation that was given prior
Page 167 and 168:
outside itself, which it can then d
Page 169 and 170:
ground that can accommodate the exp
Page 171 and 172:
These passages by no means say the
Page 173 and 174:
sensible‖ (as Deleuze would phras
Page 175 and 176:
schematization. What that is like w
Page 177 and 178:
from which the ―I think‖ gains
Page 179 and 180:
The path taken to arrive at a basic
Page 181 and 182:
As seen in chapter four, the relati
Page 183 and 184:
In so far as the Selbstsetzungslehr
Page 185 and 186:
MAN that, indeed, no science unders
Page 187 and 188:
medical doctors, educators, and phy
Page 189 and 190:
the grounding of the human sciences
Page 191 and 192:
______ ―Metaphysical Foundations
Page 193 and 194:
S. Harris. Revised Edition. Indiana
Page 195 and 196:
Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago, U
Page 197:
187
show all

The Doctrine of Self-positing and Receptivity in Kant's Late ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?