06.02.2013 Views

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

date: 20–JUL–2005<br />

3. Environmental Fate and Pathways Substance ID: 71–43–2<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Exposure duration was not reported , although it may be<br />

inferrred that this was 96 hr.<br />

The ratio of air/water used in the test systems is also not<br />

reported. It is unclear whether the test system water was<br />

supersaturated with oxygen prior to the test commencing, as<br />

the size of the fish and the assumed test duration would<br />

have exhausted dissolved oxygen under normal saturated<br />

conditions (8 – 9 ppm)<br />

Although the investigators noted<br />

poor organism health (sluggishness, erratic swimming) as<br />

signs of intoxication, the aurthors’ opinion is that the<br />

determined uptake and elimination rates are reasonably<br />

accurate estimates which were not significantly influenced<br />

by stress due to combined toxic aqueous concentrations.<br />

The development of an exposure system suitable for studying<br />

the uptake and elimination kinetics in fish of volatile<br />

chemicals is discussed. Uptake (k1) and elimination rate<br />

(k2) constants in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) were<br />

determined for a mixture of benzene and toluene, and used to<br />

estimate bioconcentration factor (BCFkin) values.<br />

Exposure experiments with 10 females per exposure were<br />

conducted in triplicate. Headspace concentrations of<br />

injected benzene & toluene in a closed system (12 L glass<br />

dessicator w/ 9L appropriate diluent water) were allowed to<br />

achieve steady state between air–water phases prior to<br />

addition of fish. Automated sampling and analysis of the<br />

air by inline GC/FID provided a concentration–time profile<br />

that was then fit to differential equations using numerical<br />

integration methods.<br />

Assumptions for the mathematical description of the system<br />

are a)instantaneous distribution of chemical between water<br />

and air (Kaw),and b) a first order one–compartment model<br />

describing the kinetics of chemical in fish. Rates were<br />

derived from the water concentrations, which were determined<br />

based on onecompartment analysis (air) with (Cw) calculated<br />

from GC results of headspace analysis of the system both<br />

empty (Cref; _concentration in air in :M/L) and when<br />

containing the water phase (Ci).<br />

Result: Uptake rate constants increased with increasing<br />

octanol–water partition coefficient (Kow), whereas the<br />

elimination rate constants were inversely related to Kow.<br />

Kaw values experimentally determined were approximately 26%<br />

lower than values reported in the literature. Since steady<br />

state concentrations were reached during fish exposure,<br />

biotransformation was not expected to have occurred, since<br />

chemical concentration did not decrease over time. Uptake<br />

rate constants increase<br />

Benzene<br />

Kaw Cwumol/L Log P:Calculated Log P:Measured<br />

0.224 0.18+/–0.01 48+/–7 2.13<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> D: Benzene SIDS <strong>Dossier</strong><br />

Uptake–k1,L/kg/hr Elimination–k2,(1/hr) BCFkin (ml/g)<br />

7+/–1 0.384+/–0.074 19<br />

– 218/957 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!