06.02.2013 Views

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

date: 20–JUL–2005<br />

5. Toxicity Substance ID: 71–43–2<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

duration of exposure. Most risk predictions for benzene<br />

exposures have been based on rubber workers who were<br />

exposed<br />

to high concentrations. In the petroleum industry, the<br />

concentration of benzene is relatively low, and there are<br />

disputes over the toxicity of low–level benzene because of<br />

a<br />

lack of evidence. In this paper we report the case of<br />

aplastic anemia induced by low–level benzene exposure.<br />

Additional Comments: Concomitant exposures to other<br />

airborne chemicals or contaminants at the worker’s factory<br />

were not examined and potential contribution due to other<br />

chemicals has not been ruled out.<br />

Aplastic anemia in a petrochemical factory worker.<br />

Source: EXXON Biomedical Sciences East Millstone, NJ<br />

Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions<br />

07–JUL–2005 (63)<br />

Remark: OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between<br />

risk of premenopausal breast cancer and occupational<br />

exposure to benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />

(PAH) and whether the proposed relationship between PAH and<br />

breast cancer differed by tumor estrogen receptor (ER)<br />

status. METHODS: In a case–referent study of premenopausal<br />

breast cancer, occupational histories and other information<br />

were obtained through interviews, and job–exposure matrices<br />

were used to assess exposure to PAH and benzene. RESULTS: A<br />

dose–response relationship for the probability of exposure<br />

to benzene [low: odds ratio (OR) 1.64, 95% confidence<br />

interval (95% CI) 0.64–4.21; high: OR 1.95, 95% CI<br />

1.14–3.33) and to PAH (low: OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.78–3.12;<br />

high:<br />

OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.96–6.01). Risk increased with duration of<br />

exposure to benzene, but not to PAH. A dose–response<br />

relationship was not evident for the intensity of exposure<br />

to benzene or to PAH. When analyses were stratified by<br />

tumor<br />

ER status, PAH exposure was related to a greater increase<br />

in<br />

the risk of ER–positive (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.14–4.54) than<br />

ER–negative (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.47–2.64) breast cancer. Risk<br />

of ER–positive, but not ER–negative, tumors increased with<br />

the probability of exposure to PAH. CONCLUSIONS: The<br />

findings suggest an association between risk and<br />

occupational exposure to benzene. Although it was difficult<br />

to study PAH independently of benzene, there was some<br />

suggestion of an association between PAH exposure and<br />

ER–positive tumors. These data should be interpreted with<br />

caution because of the limitations of this study, including<br />

low–response rates and small numbers of exposed persons.<br />

Risk of premenopausal breast cancer in association with<br />

occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />

and benzene.<br />

Source: EXXON Biomedical Sciences East Millstone, NJ<br />

Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> D: Benzene SIDS <strong>Dossier</strong><br />

– 735/957 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!