06.02.2013 Views

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

Appendix D - Dossier (PDF) - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

date: 20–JUL–2005<br />

5. Toxicity Substance ID: 71–43–2<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

periods, specific age and sex groups of the Benzene<br />

Subregistry population reported more adverse health<br />

outcomes<br />

when compared with the NHIS population, including anemia<br />

and<br />

other blood disorders, ulcers, gall bladder trouble, and<br />

stomach or intestinal problems, stroke, urinary tract<br />

disorders, skin rashes, diabetes, kidney disease, and<br />

respiratory allergies. Statistically significant deficits<br />

for the Benzene Subregistry population overall were found<br />

for asthma, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis; arthritis,<br />

rheumatism, or other joint disorders; hearing impairment;<br />

and speech impairment. No statistically significant<br />

differences between the two populations were seen for the<br />

outcomes hypertension; liver disease; mental retardation;<br />

or<br />

cancer. These results do not identify a causal relationship<br />

between benzene exposure and adverse health effects;<br />

however, they do reinforce the need for continued followup<br />

of registrants.<br />

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This is a cross–sectional survey of<br />

self–reported health outcomes for 1143 individuals (1127<br />

alive at interview, 573 males) living near a hazardous<br />

waste<br />

site in Texas. All residents of the Three Lakes Municipal<br />

Utility District were targeted for inclusion, because<br />

benzene had been found in their groundwater (source of<br />

drinking water) at up to 66 ppb. All individuals were<br />

considered to be chronically exposed to benzene. No<br />

individual measurements were available and no questions<br />

relating to exposure modification (i.e water intake) appear<br />

to have been asked. Prior to the start of the study,<br />

extensive outreach was performed, including advanced<br />

publicity regarding the exposure and its health effects.<br />

Response rates were high, with more than 90% of contacted<br />

individuals being interviewed. All health outcomes were<br />

self–reported and were considered physician confirmed if<br />

the<br />

subject reported that a physician had told them the<br />

diagnosis. Physician confirmation was actually only<br />

attempted for cancer, and only 14 of 53 self–reported<br />

cancers were evaluated. Only 4 of the 14 self–reported<br />

cancer cases were reported correctly. Multiple comparisons<br />

were performed on subjects grouped by age, sex, and<br />

outcome.<br />

Cancer analyses were based only on the 6 cancer deaths that<br />

had been correctly reported (out of 10 cancer deaths<br />

reported). Biological plausibility was inferred if any<br />

laboratory or epidemiological study suggested any impact on<br />

the organs of interest, regardless of the dose.<br />

The National Exposure Registry: analyses of health outcomes<br />

from the benzene subregistry.<br />

Source: EXXON Biomedical Sciences East Millstone, NJ<br />

Reliability: (3) invalid<br />

03–NOV–1998 (169)<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> D: Benzene SIDS <strong>Dossier</strong><br />

– 715/957 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!