10.07.2015 Views

Los retos de la historia oral en el siglo XXI: diversidades ...

Los retos de la historia oral en el siglo XXI: diversidades ...

Los retos de la historia oral en el siglo XXI: diversidades ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sesiones parale<strong>la</strong>s / Parall<strong>el</strong> sessionsSince the 1970 th the historical as w<strong>el</strong>l as the social and political perspectiveon National Socialism and Word War II was dominated by the victims, first ofall victims of the Holocaust followed by other persecuted groups. Asi<strong>de</strong>, therewas <strong>de</strong>finit<strong>el</strong>y no room for the experi<strong>en</strong>ce of Germans being victims in someway or other as w<strong>el</strong>l. For those Germans, who experi<strong>en</strong>ced the war as part oftheir childhood, this dogma of remembrance seems to work twice. Not onlythat historical sci<strong>en</strong>ce and politics did not acknowledge or ev<strong>en</strong> notice theirsuffering, they thems<strong>el</strong>ves never paid att<strong>en</strong>tion to their very special childhood.“That was normal to us”, is what they said so far. In this s<strong>en</strong>se the term “forgott<strong>en</strong>g<strong>en</strong>eration” reveals a double meaning.In the meantime, the former childr<strong>en</strong> of war, born betwe<strong>en</strong> 1930 and 1945, reachedan age of 65 up to 80 years. They retired from their jobs and their childr<strong>en</strong>are adult and left home long ago. They look back and some seem to fe<strong>el</strong> thattheir childhood, dominated by the war in various ways, influ<strong>en</strong>ced their lifemuch more than they had admitted so far. As we know today by medical andpsychological studies not less members of this g<strong>en</strong>eration came down withm<strong>en</strong>tal and/or physical diseases that can be interpreted as long-term consequ<strong>en</strong>cesof their war experi<strong>en</strong>ces.The paper based on interviews with people who regar<strong>de</strong>d thems<strong>el</strong>ves as childr<strong>en</strong>of war and donate their interview to an association called “Childr<strong>en</strong> of warfor peace”. Ev<strong>en</strong> though the question remains op<strong>en</strong> either the war experi<strong>en</strong>ceconstitutes a g<strong>en</strong>eration or the experi<strong>en</strong>ces are too differ<strong>en</strong>t, the sample isobviously far from being repres<strong>en</strong>tative for this g<strong>en</strong>eration not ev<strong>en</strong> for childr<strong>en</strong>of war. Neverth<strong>el</strong>ess the sample conveys instructive thoughts that willbe argued on three lev<strong>el</strong>s: first, the lev<strong>el</strong> of remembered experi<strong>en</strong>ces whichwill be illustrated by typical examples; second, the lev<strong>el</strong> of s<strong>el</strong>f-interpretationfollowing the interviewee’s analysis of how the war experi<strong>en</strong>ce influ<strong>en</strong>ced theirlife and moreover pot<strong>en</strong>tially the life of their childr<strong>en</strong> and grandchildr<strong>en</strong>; andthird, the lev<strong>el</strong> of remembrance culture and politics asking for the influ<strong>en</strong>ceon individual memory and s<strong>el</strong>f-construction. The question behind is either thewar experi<strong>en</strong>ce can be evaluated as a g<strong>en</strong>eration experi<strong>en</strong>ce or the other wayround the vivid public discussion on childr<strong>en</strong> of war offers a category to reshapeand review individual memory.VON PLATO, Alexan<strong>de</strong>rOpposition Members betwe<strong>en</strong> Personal Experi<strong>en</strong>ceand “History-Politics“Which were the ways into opposition in the German Democratic Republic?What were the aims the members of the differ<strong>en</strong>t groups and circles did follow?Which were the main instrum<strong>en</strong>ts of the State Security Police (“Stasi”)against them? How did they resist? Which role did the “other part” of Germanyin the heads of these persons p<strong>la</strong>y? How did they live after reunification? Andare there contradictions betwe<strong>en</strong> the policy of the German governm<strong>en</strong>t, media,schoolbooks and the personal remembrance of the former <strong>en</strong>emies of theEast German system?These and others were the questions of a big international project at the Universityof Brem<strong>en</strong>, especially of the project part which <strong>de</strong>alt with biographiesand memories of opposition members in Po<strong>la</strong>nd, Czechoslovakia and Germany.In my lecture I will pres<strong>en</strong>t some of the main results of this project concerningGermany with some comparisons to Czechoslovakia and Po<strong>la</strong>nd.MICHAL, LoučThe Czechoslovak political trials in the 1950s. Thesecond g<strong>en</strong>erational trauma in the story of the politicalprisoner’s sonThis article contributes to the historiography of the socialist dictatorship inCzechoslovakia betwe<strong>en</strong> the years 1948–1989. The rebuilding of the society inthe Soviet way produced about 250.000 political prisoners. Most of them werejailed in the years 1948–1960, wh<strong>en</strong> the oppression took the highest rates. Thebiggest political trial in that time was with a female politician Mi<strong>la</strong>da Horákováand tw<strong>el</strong>ve other resistance group members followed by 627 people in thet<strong>en</strong>th of smaller local trials carried out around the country. While the main trialwas carried publicly by using all the state’s propaganda, the local trials remainalmost forgott<strong>en</strong> and out of the curr<strong>en</strong>t public interest.Antonín Městecký was a child wh<strong>en</strong> his father was imprisoned for 11 years inthe local show trial in Hra<strong>de</strong>c Králové. His imprisonm<strong>en</strong>t was his strongestchildhood experi<strong>en</strong>ce and wh<strong>en</strong> his father came back to home he met himas an adult and kept sil<strong>en</strong>t about the past. They never discussed what reallyhapp<strong>en</strong>ed in the time of his father’s imprisonm<strong>en</strong>t and that caused a severaltrauma to him. How can be remembered the turning point in someone’s life ifwe have only limited information about it?Using <strong>oral</strong> history methods, this paper explores how Mr. Městecký tries to <strong>de</strong>alwith this gap in his family’s history by broa<strong>de</strong>ning his childhood remembranceswith the information told to him by father’s resistance group members orfound in the books and archives. In the methodology I will also reflect in themethodology that ev<strong>en</strong> sharing his story with me was a part in the bridging thegap. His narrative contains rich accounts of life and survival as w<strong>el</strong>l as interestingmom<strong>en</strong>ts and sil<strong>en</strong>ces, revealing the complexities of narratives of traumaaffected the <strong>de</strong>sc<strong>en</strong>dants of the former political prisoners.BATISTA, EvaContemporary Narratives of Second World War inSlov<strong>en</strong>iaSlov<strong>en</strong>ia’s transformation from a socialist to <strong>de</strong>mocratic political or<strong>de</strong>r in 1991created the necessity for new means of articu<strong>la</strong>ting Slov<strong>en</strong>e national memoryand i<strong>de</strong>ntity. Since th<strong>en</strong>, struggles over interpretations of the ev<strong>en</strong>ts of theSecond World War on Slov<strong>en</strong>e territory have come to the fore. Demands werema<strong>de</strong> to come to terms with the war once and for all. However, they resultedin politico-i<strong>de</strong>ological struggles over s<strong>el</strong>ective constructions of the war pastas w<strong>el</strong>l as of the socialist past in g<strong>en</strong>eral. These struggles were furthermorefu<strong>el</strong>led by the actuary logic of (re)counting the numbers of war victims, by thediscoveries of mass graves of victims of the post-war killings during the 1990sand continue to evolve in the media, political and aca<strong>de</strong>mic spheres, as w<strong>el</strong><strong>la</strong>s everyday life.The focus of this paper is on personal war narratives as opposed to the Slov<strong>en</strong>ewar narrative, in or<strong>de</strong>r to portray the diversity and complexity of individual warexperi<strong>en</strong>ces and to give p<strong>la</strong>ce to individual s<strong>en</strong>sory memories and histories.The ethnography of eight narratives, which I collected during my fi<strong>el</strong>dwork inSlov<strong>en</strong>ia in 2011, is re<strong>la</strong>ted to exploring the re<strong>la</strong>tionship betwe<strong>en</strong> war viol<strong>en</strong>ce,i<strong>de</strong>ntity and narrative. The interviewed individuals are former Partisans, activistsof the resistance movem<strong>en</strong>t called the Liberation Front, or internees whowere <strong>de</strong>ported to conc<strong>en</strong>tration camps because of their role in the resistancemovem<strong>en</strong>t. Within the collected narratives, “residues of meaningful experi<strong>en</strong>ce”are located, which do not fit in the Slov<strong>en</strong>e war narrative and are, as such,especially important, because they <strong>de</strong>fy juridical, therapeutic or other formsof rationalisation. I <strong>de</strong>al with the personal war narratives as a form of “socia<strong>la</strong>rticu<strong>la</strong>tion”, which interv<strong>en</strong>e in the pres<strong>en</strong>t social context and are thus notmere repres<strong>en</strong>tations of the past. Strategies of adaptation, survivals and resistanceare located within the narratives and their role as sites of individuals’rec<strong>la</strong>iming and remaking of their s<strong>en</strong>se of p<strong>la</strong>ce and i<strong>de</strong>ntity in a war-affectedworld is explored.——————————————————————————————————————————————Espacio Virrey Liniers——————————————————————————————————————————————MESA PANEL 11Oríg<strong>en</strong>es <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> <strong>de</strong>mocracia participativa <strong>en</strong>V<strong>en</strong>ezue<strong>la</strong>A cargo <strong>de</strong>: Margarita López Maya——————————————————————————————————————————————13.15 a 14.45 - Almuerzo——————————————————————————————————————————————14.45 a 16.45 horasC<strong>en</strong>tro Cultural G<strong>en</strong>eral San Martín——————————————————————————————————————————————Subtema / Subteme 12Migraciones, memorias <strong>de</strong>l exilio, diásporas, y <strong>la</strong>hu<strong>el</strong><strong>la</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong>s fronteras <strong>en</strong> <strong>la</strong> memoria / Migration,Exhile, Disaporas, and Bor<strong>de</strong>r<strong>la</strong>nds.Sa<strong>la</strong> C - Mesa / Session 52Coordinan / Chair: Mónica Gatica y Silvina J<strong>en</strong>s<strong>en</strong>——————————————————————————————————————————————DUARTE, G<strong>en</strong>i RosaMúsicos <strong>en</strong> <strong>la</strong> Triple Frontera: migraciones y <strong>de</strong>sp<strong>la</strong>zami<strong>en</strong>tosEsta comunicación se refiere a un proyecto <strong>de</strong> investigación <strong>de</strong>stinado a analizarre<strong>la</strong>tos <strong>de</strong> músicos que han trabajado o trabajan <strong>en</strong> <strong>la</strong> región <strong>de</strong>limitadapor <strong>la</strong> Triple Frontera, región fronteriza <strong>de</strong> Foz <strong>de</strong> Iguazú, <strong>en</strong>tre Brasil, Arg<strong>en</strong>tinay Paraguay. El objetivo <strong>de</strong>l proyecto es discutir <strong>la</strong>s distintas formas <strong>de</strong>107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!