62622. Koes BW, Scholten RJPM, Mens JMA, Bouter LM. Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatorydrugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56: 214-23.3. van Tulder MW, Scholten RJPM, Koes BW, Deyo RA. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs) for non-specific low back pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4,2000. Oxford: Update Software.4. van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, Solway S, Bouter LM. Muscle relaxants for non-specificlow back pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.5. Amadio P, Cummings DM (1983) Evaluation of acetaminophen in the management of osteoarthiritsof the knee. Curr Ther Res, 34(1): 59-66.6. Berry H, Bloom B, Hamilton EB, Swinson DR (1982) Naproxen sodium, diflunisal, and placeboin the treatment of chronic back pain. Ann Rheum Dis, 41(2): 129-32.7. Birbara CA, Puopolo AD, Munoz DR, Sheldon EA, Mangione A, Bohidar NR, Geba GP (2003)Treatment of chronic low back pain with etoricoxib, a new cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor:improvement in pain and disability--a randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-month trial. J Pain, 4(6):307-15.8. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, Day R, Ferraz MB,Hawkey CJ, Hochberg MC, Kvien TK, Schnitzer TJ (2000) Comparison of upper gastrointestinaltoxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. NEngl J Med, 343(21): 1520-8, 2 p following 8.9. Chrubasik S, Model A, Black A, Pollak S (2003) A randomized double-blind pilot study comparingDoloteffin and Vioxx in the treatment of low back pain. Rheumatology (Oxford), 42(1): 141-8.10.Hickey RF (1982) Chronic low back pain: a comparison of diflunisal with paracetamol. N Z MedJ, 95(707): 312-4.11.Ju WD, Krupa DA, Walters DJ, Newman TL, Borenstein DG, Katz N, Group VC (2001) A placebocontrolledtrial of rofecoxib in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Pain Med, 2(3): 242-3.12.Katz N, Ju WD, Krupa DA, Sperling RS, Bozalis Rodgers D, Gertz BJ, Gimbel J, Coleman S,Fisher C, Nabizadeh S, Borenstein D (2003) Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib in patients withchronic low back pain: results from two 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group,double-blind trials. Spine, 28(9): 851-8; discussion 9.13.Katz N, Rodgers DB, Krupa D, Reicin A (2004) Onset of pain relief with rofecoxib in chronic lowback pain: results of two four-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin,20(5): 651-8.14.Pallay R, Seger W, Adler J, Ettlinger R, Quaidoo E, Lipetz R, O'Brien K, Mucciola L, Skalky C,Petruschke R, Bohidar N, Geba G (2004) Etoricoxib reduced pain and disability and improvedquality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a 3 month, randomized, controlled trial. ScandJ Rheumatol, 33(4): 257-66.15.Postacchini F, Facchini M, Palieri P (1988) Efficacy of various forms of conservative treatmentin low back pain: a comparative study. Neurol Orthop, 6: 113-6.16.Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, Makuch R, Eisen G,Agrawal NM, Stenson WF, Burr AM, Zhao WW, Kent JD, Lefkowith JB, Verburg KM, Geis GS(2000) Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs forosteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. CelecoxibLong-term Arthritis Safety Study. Jama, 284(10): 1247-55.17.Topol EJ (2004) Failing the Public Health -- Rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA. N Engl J Med.18.Towheed TE, Judd MJ, Hochberg MC, Wells G (2003) Acetaminophen for osteoarthritis. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev, (2): CD004257.19.van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1997) Conservative treatment of acute and chronicnonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most commoninterventions. Spine, 22(18): 2128-56.
20.Vetter G, Bruggemann G, Lettko M, Schwieger G, Asbach H, Biermann W, Blasius K, BrinkmannR, Bruns H, Dorn E, et al. (1988) [Shortening diclofenac therapy by B vitamins. Results of arandomized double-blind study, diclofenac 50 mg versus diclofenac 50 mg plus B vitamins, inpainful spinal diseases with degenerative changes]. Z Rheumatol, 47(5): 351-62.21.Videman T, Osterman K (1984) Double-blind parallel study of piroxicam versus indomethacin inthe treatment of low back pain. Ann Clin Res, 16(3): 156-6022.Arbus L, Fajadet B, Aubert D, Morre M, Goldfinger E (1990) Activity of tetrazepam in low backpain. Clinical Trials Journal, 27(4): 258-67.23.Basmajian JV (1978) Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride effect on skeletal muscle spasm in thelumbar region and neck: two double-blind controlled clinical and laboratory studies. Arch PhysMed Rehabil, 59(2): 58-63.24.Casale R (1988) Acute low back pain: Symptomatic treatment with a muscle relaxant drug. TheClinical Journal of Pain, 4: 81-8.25.Pipino F, Menarini C, Lombardi G, Guerzoni P, Ferrini A, Pizzoli A, Grangie A, Beltrame A, SorbilliG, Gottardo R, Cilento F (1991) A direct myotonolytic (Pridinol Mesilate) for the management ofchronic low back pain: A multicentre, comparative clinical evaluation. European Journal of ClinicalResearch, 1: 55-70.26.Pratzel HG, Alken RG, Ramm S (1996) Efficacy and tolerance of repeated oral doses of tolperisonehydrochloride in the treatment of painful reflex muscle spasm: results of a prospective placebocontrolleddouble-blind trial. Pain, 67(2-3): 417-25.27.Salzmann E, Pforringer W, Paal G, Gierend M (1992) Treatment of chronic low-back syndromewith tetrazepam in a placebo controlled double-blind trial. J Drug Dev, 4: 219-28.28.Worz R, Bolten W, Heller B, Krainick JU, Pergande G (1996) [Flupirtine in comparison withchlormezanone in chronic musculoskeletal back pain. Results of a multicenter randomized doubleblindstudy]. Fortschr Med, 114(35-36): 500-463 636.1.5 Intervención neurorreflejoterápica.RecomendaciónDerive a intervención neurorreflejoterápica (NRT) a los pacientes en los que estatecnología está indicada.IndicaciónPacientes en los que el dolor persiste tras 14 o más días de tratamiento farmacológico,con una intensidad 3 puntos en una escala analógica visual (cuyo rango va de 0–no dolor- a 10 –máximo dolor imaginable-).Síntesis de la evidenciaLa intervención NRT es eficaz y segura para el tratamiento de lalumbalgiaLa intervención NRT es efectiva y coste/efectiva para el tratamientode la lumbalgiaNivel ANivel C
- Page 2:
La versión española de la Guía d
- Page 9 and 10:
1.4 Miembros el Grupo de Trabajo so
- Page 11 and 12: • La Dra. Dña. Violeta González
- Page 13 and 14: · El grupo sobre Lumbalgia Crónic
- Page 15 and 16: los pocos meses de nacer los Grupos
- Page 17 and 18: utinaria, en la que es poco realist
- Page 19 and 20: c) Para evitar que las eventuales v
- Page 21 and 22: Periódicamente, el Grupo analizar
- Page 23: en el ámbito de las patologías me
- Page 26: Ejemplos de situaciones considerada
- Page 31 and 32: Posteriormente, el conjunto de la G
- Page 33 and 34: al fundamento científico de las re
- Page 35 and 36: · Las medidas recomendadas que est
- Page 37 and 38: 23. Se han registrado los conflicto
- Page 39 and 40: CSAG Committee on Back Pain. Manage
- Page 41 and 42: 4.1 CLASIFICACIÓN DIAGNÓSTICA.Rec
- Page 43 and 44: · Conductas inadecuadas (conductas
- Page 45 and 46: · La gammagrafía y el SPECT puede
- Page 47 and 48: diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern
- Page 49 and 50: 45.Yoshida H, Fujiwara A, Tamai K,
- Page 51 and 52: ComentariosEn contra de lo que se h
- Page 53 and 54: El hallazgo de signos de compromiso
- Page 55 and 56: · La lumbalgia inespecífica no se
- Page 57 and 58: 9. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mut
- Page 59 and 60: 6.1.3 Mantener el mayor grado posib
- Page 61: En la lumbalgia crónica:Los antiin
- Page 65 and 66: Síntesis de la evidenciaEn las dos
- Page 67 and 68: 26.Ghoname EA, Craig WF, White PF,
- Page 69 and 70: 67.O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey
- Page 71 and 72: El efecto de las “Escuelas de la
- Page 73 and 74: ComentariosLos antidepresivos tric
- Page 75 and 76: ComentariosDe acuerdo con el único
- Page 77 and 78: 33.Turner JA, Clancy S, McQuade KJ,
- Page 79 and 80: 2. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby
- Page 81 and 82: the medical care of chronic low bac
- Page 83 and 84: Síntesis de la evidenciaLa PENS es
- Page 85 and 86: En España, en 2002, la tasa de rea
- Page 87 and 88: 24.Keller A, Brox JI, Gunderson R,
- Page 89 and 90: EvidenciaNingún estudio ha analiza
- Page 91 and 92: ComentariosEste ese una de las dos
- Page 93 and 94: La evidencia sobre eficacia procede
- Page 95 and 96: ) En comparación con la infiltraci
- Page 97 and 98: 6.3.5. Infiltraciones facetarias de
- Page 99 and 100: Bibliografía1. Dechow E, Davies RK
- Page 101 and 102: 12. Oh WS, Shim JC (2004) A randomi
- Page 103 and 104: Los efectos secundarios más graves
- Page 105 and 106: 26.Hemmila HM, Keinanen-Kiukaanniem
- Page 107 and 108: ComentariosLa mayoría de los estud
- Page 109 and 110: 23.Leake R, Broderick JE (1998) Tre
- Page 111 and 112: 5. Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Krasn
- Page 113 and 114:
) Las características técnicas de
- Page 115 and 116:
6.3.18 Gabapentina.RecomendaciónNo
- Page 117 and 118:
· Las intervenciones ergonómicas
- Page 119 and 120:
Balagué F, Skovron ML, Nordin M, D
- Page 121 and 122:
a population of school children. Eu
- Page 123 and 124:
Leclaire R, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, R
- Page 125 and 126:
Journal 12: 581-588.Sjölie AN, Lju
- Page 127 and 128:
ANEXO 1: Criterios para definir la
- Page 129 and 130:
¿La selección de los pacientes a
- Page 131 and 132:
ANEXO 3: Niveles de evidencia.Nivel
- Page 133:
Niveles de evidencia sobre prevenci