Guia Lumbalgia (cambios 8 feb).FH10 - Digemid

El efecto de las “Escuelas de la Espalda” tradicionales (con contenidos de anatomía,fisiología, higiene postural y/o ergonomía) no ha sido adecuadamente evaluado,por lo que no pueden ser recomendadas.La coste/efectividad de las Escuelas de la Espalda es desconocida.Bibliografía1. Cohen JE, Goel V, Frank JW, Bombardier C, Peloso P, Guillemin F (1994) Group educationinterventions for people with low back pain. An overview of the literature. Spine, 19(11): 1214-22.2. Dalichau S, Perrey RM, Solbach T, Elliehausen H-J (1998) Erfahrungen bei der Durchfuhrungeines berufsbezogenen Rückenschulmodells in Baugewerbe. Arbeitsmedizin, 48: 72-80.3. Dalichau S, Scheele K, Perrey RM, Solbach T, Elliehausen H-J, Huebner J (1999) Ultraschallgestützte Haltungs- und Bewegungsanalyse der Lendenwirbelsäule zum Nachweis der Wirksamkeiteiner Rückenschule. Arbeitsmedizin, 49: 148-56.4. Forssell MZ (1980) The Swedish Back School. Physiotherapy, 66(4): 112-4.5. Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Soukup MG, Bo K, Larsen S (2001) "Active back school", prophylacticmanagement for low back pain: three-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J RehabilMed, 33(1): 26-30.6. Harkapaa K, Jarvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H (1989) A controlled study on the outcome of inpatientand outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part I. Pain, disability, compliance, and reportedtreatment benefits three months after treatment. Scand J Rehabil Med, 21(2): 81-9.7. Harkapaa K, Mellin G, Jarvikoski A, Hurri H (1990) A controlled study on the outcome of inpatientand outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part III. Long-term follow-up of pain, disability, andcompliance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 22(4): 181-8.8. Heymans MW, Van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW (2004) Back schools for nonspecificlow back pain. In The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester,UK.9. Hurri H (1989a) The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain. Part I. Benefits. Scand JRehabil Med, 21(1): 33-40.10.Hurri H (1989b) The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain. Part II. Factors predictingthe outcome. Scand J Rehabil Med, 21(1): 41-4.11.Julkunen J, Hurri H, Kankainen J (1988) Psychological factors in the treatment of chronic lowback pain. Follow-up study of a back school intervention. Psychother Psychosom, 50(4): 173-81.12.Keijsers JF, Groenman NH, Gerards FM, van Oudheusden E, Steenbakkers M (1989) A backschool in The Netherlands: evaluating the results. Patient Educ Couns, 14(1): 31-44.13.Keijsers JFME, Steenbakkers WHL, Meertens RM, Bouter LM, Kok GJ (1990) The efficacy ofthe back school: a randomized trial. Arthritis Care and Research, 3: 204-9.14.Klaber Moffett JA, Chase SM, Portek I, Ennis JR (1986) A controlled, prospective study to evaluatethe effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain. Spine, 11(2): 120-2.15.Koes BW, van Tulder MW, van der Windt WM, Bouter LM (1994) The efficacy of back schools:a review of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol, 47(8): 851-62.16. Lankhorst GJ, Van de Stadt RJ, Vogelaar TW, Van der Korst JK, Prevo AJ (1983) The effect ofthe Swedish Back School in chronic idiopathic low back pain. A prospective controlled study.Scand J Rehabil Med, 15(3): 141-5.17.Linton SJ, Bradley LA, Jensen I, Spangfort E, Sundell L (1989) The secondary prevention of lowback pain: a controlled study with follow-up. Pain, 36(2): 197-207.18.Lonn JH, Glomsrod B, Soukup MG, Bo K, Larsen S (1999) Active back school: prophylactic71 71