8686degeneration. Spine, 28(17): 1913-21.9. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA (2002a) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion usingrhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech, 15(5): 337-49.10.Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, Watkins RG, Balderston RA (2002b) Clinical and radiographicoutcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogeneticprotein-2. Spine, 27(21): 2396-408.11.Christensen BF, Hansen SE, Laursen M, Thomsen K, Bunger CE (2002a) Long-term functionaloutcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomizedclinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine, 27(12): 1269-77.12.Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, Hoy K, Helmig P, Neumann P, Niedermann B, BungerCE (2002b) Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusionwith titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146patients. Spine, 27(23): 2674-83.13.de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain:background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J, 12(2): 108-16.14.Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, Bae H (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar discreplacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine, 28(20):S167-75.15.Fairbank JC, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R (2004) The MRC SpineStabilisation Trial. A randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbarspine versus an intensive rehabilitation programme on outcome in patients with chronic low backpain. BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.BF (published 23 May 2005)16.Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson D, Nordwall A (2004) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion andnonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter,randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine, 29(4): 421-34;discussion Z3.17.Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low backpain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A reportfrom the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J, 12(2): 178-89.18.Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies:Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomizedcontrolled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine, 26(23): 2521-32; discussion32-4.19.Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparisonof three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbarspine study group. Spine, 27(11): 1131-41.20.Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B (2004)Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical resultswith those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective,randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submissionfrom the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.J Neurosurg Spine, 1(2): 143-54.21.Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G (1999) The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapseand degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine, 24(17): 1820-32.22.Grupo de Variaciones en la Práctica Médica de la Red temática de Investigación en Resultadosy Servicios de Salud (Grupo VPC-IRYS). Variaciones en cirugía ortopédica y traumatología enel Sistema Nacional de Salud. Atlas VPM, Zaragoza: Instituto Aragonés deÊCiencias deÊlaSalud;Ê2005;(1)p.17-36.23.Johnsson R, Stromqvist B, Aspenberg P (2002) Randomized radiostereometric study comparingosteogegnic protein-1 (BMP-7) and autograft bone in human noninstrumented posterolaterallumbar fusion: 2002 Volvo Award in clinical studies. Spine, 27(23): 2654-61.
24.Keller A, Brox JI, Gunderson R, Holm I, Friis A, Reikeras O (2004) Trunk muscle strength, crosssectionalarea, and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusionor cognitive intervention and exercises. Spine, 29(1): 3-8.25.Ma Y, Guo L, Cai X (2001) [Posterior interbody fusion or posterolateral fusion for discogenic lowback pain]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 81(20): 1253-5.26.Madan S, Boeree NR (2003) Outcome of the Graf ligamentoplasty procedure compared withanterior lumbar interbody fusion with the Hartshill horseshoe cage. Eur Spine J, 12(4): 361-8.27.McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003a) Experimental designof total disk replacement-experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charite.Spine, 28(20): S153-62.28.McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003b) SB Charite discreplacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech,16(4): 424-33.29.McAfee PC, Lee GA, Fedder IL, Cunningham BW (2002) Anterior BAK instrumentation andfusion: complete versus partial discectomy. Clin Orthop, (394): 55-63.30.Sasso RC, Kitchel SH, Dawson EG (2004) A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial ofanterior lumbar interbody fusion using a titanium cylindrical threaded fusion device. Spine, 29(2):113-22; discussion 21-2.31.Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, Hansen ES, Fruensgaard S, Bunger CE (1997) 1997Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functionaloutcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinicalstudy. Spine, 22(24): 2813-22.32.Zhao J, Wang X, Hou T, He S (2002) One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbarinterbody fusion to L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a randomized, controlled prospectivestudy in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine, 27(24): 2753-7.33.Zigler JE (2003) Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation deviceexemption study. Spine, 28(20): S163-6.34.Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spinearthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplastyversus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 16(4): 352-6135.Oliver Rivero-Arias, Helen Campbell, Alastair Gray, Jeremy Fairbank, Helen Frost, James Wilson-MacDonald for the Spine Stabilisation Trial Group. Surgical stabilisation of the spine comparedwith a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic lowback pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ,doi:10.1136/bmj.38441.429618.BF (published 23 May 2005)87 876.2 TRATAMIENTOS QUE NO PUEDEN SER RECOMENDADOSPORQUE NO HAN SIDO ADECUADAMENTE EVALUADOS.En este capítulo se mencionan los tratamientos que, aunque se apliquen o hayanaplicado en algún ámbito asistencial, no han sido evaluados con métodos apropiados(ensayos clínicos controlados). Estos son:6.2.1 Corrientes interferenciales
- Page 2:
La versión española de la Guía d
- Page 9 and 10:
1.4 Miembros el Grupo de Trabajo so
- Page 11 and 12:
• La Dra. Dña. Violeta González
- Page 13 and 14:
· El grupo sobre Lumbalgia Crónic
- Page 15 and 16:
los pocos meses de nacer los Grupos
- Page 17 and 18:
utinaria, en la que es poco realist
- Page 19 and 20:
c) Para evitar que las eventuales v
- Page 21 and 22:
Periódicamente, el Grupo analizar
- Page 23:
en el ámbito de las patologías me
- Page 26:
Ejemplos de situaciones considerada
- Page 31 and 32:
Posteriormente, el conjunto de la G
- Page 33 and 34:
al fundamento científico de las re
- Page 35 and 36: · Las medidas recomendadas que est
- Page 37 and 38: 23. Se han registrado los conflicto
- Page 39 and 40: CSAG Committee on Back Pain. Manage
- Page 41 and 42: 4.1 CLASIFICACIÓN DIAGNÓSTICA.Rec
- Page 43 and 44: · Conductas inadecuadas (conductas
- Page 45 and 46: · La gammagrafía y el SPECT puede
- Page 47 and 48: diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern
- Page 49 and 50: 45.Yoshida H, Fujiwara A, Tamai K,
- Page 51 and 52: ComentariosEn contra de lo que se h
- Page 53 and 54: El hallazgo de signos de compromiso
- Page 55 and 56: · La lumbalgia inespecífica no se
- Page 57 and 58: 9. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mut
- Page 59 and 60: 6.1.3 Mantener el mayor grado posib
- Page 61 and 62: En la lumbalgia crónica:Los antiin
- Page 63 and 64: 20.Vetter G, Bruggemann G, Lettko M
- Page 65 and 66: Síntesis de la evidenciaEn las dos
- Page 67 and 68: 26.Ghoname EA, Craig WF, White PF,
- Page 69 and 70: 67.O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey
- Page 71 and 72: El efecto de las “Escuelas de la
- Page 73 and 74: ComentariosLos antidepresivos tric
- Page 75 and 76: ComentariosDe acuerdo con el único
- Page 77 and 78: 33.Turner JA, Clancy S, McQuade KJ,
- Page 79 and 80: 2. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby
- Page 81 and 82: the medical care of chronic low bac
- Page 83 and 84: Síntesis de la evidenciaLa PENS es
- Page 85: En España, en 2002, la tasa de rea
- Page 89 and 90: EvidenciaNingún estudio ha analiza
- Page 91 and 92: ComentariosEste ese una de las dos
- Page 93 and 94: La evidencia sobre eficacia procede
- Page 95 and 96: ) En comparación con la infiltraci
- Page 97 and 98: 6.3.5. Infiltraciones facetarias de
- Page 99 and 100: Bibliografía1. Dechow E, Davies RK
- Page 101 and 102: 12. Oh WS, Shim JC (2004) A randomi
- Page 103 and 104: Los efectos secundarios más graves
- Page 105 and 106: 26.Hemmila HM, Keinanen-Kiukaanniem
- Page 107 and 108: ComentariosLa mayoría de los estud
- Page 109 and 110: 23.Leake R, Broderick JE (1998) Tre
- Page 111 and 112: 5. Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Krasn
- Page 113 and 114: ) Las características técnicas de
- Page 115 and 116: 6.3.18 Gabapentina.RecomendaciónNo
- Page 117 and 118: · Las intervenciones ergonómicas
- Page 119 and 120: Balagué F, Skovron ML, Nordin M, D
- Page 121 and 122: a population of school children. Eu
- Page 123 and 124: Leclaire R, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, R
- Page 125 and 126: Journal 12: 581-588.Sjölie AN, Lju
- Page 127 and 128: ANEXO 1: Criterios para definir la
- Page 129 and 130: ¿La selección de los pacientes a
- Page 131 and 132: ANEXO 3: Niveles de evidencia.Nivel
- Page 133: Niveles de evidencia sobre prevenci