12.07.2015 Views

Abstract - Quest for Global Competitiveness - Universidad de Puerto ...

Abstract - Quest for Global Competitiveness - Universidad de Puerto ...

Abstract - Quest for Global Competitiveness - Universidad de Puerto ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The studies mentioned above find conflicting results in relation to EMH. Thein<strong>for</strong>mation inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the financial statements, the notes to the financial statementsand other complementary in<strong>for</strong>mation should be relevant and reliable. As seen fromthese studies, concerns about the incorporation of accounting in<strong>for</strong>mation have arisenthrough the years. Some elements of accounting in<strong>for</strong>mation have evolved in terms ofimportance to the company and investors, and, as a result, the need <strong>for</strong> betterdisclosure of in<strong>for</strong>mation. A clear example <strong>for</strong> the increasing importance of accountingin<strong>for</strong>mation disclosures is pension plan accounting.A review of the literature suggests that the market overvalues firms with severelyun<strong>de</strong>rfun<strong>de</strong>d pension plans (Franzoni and Marín 2006, Godwin and Key 1998).Furthermore, investors do not anticipate the impact of the pension liability on futureearnings, and they are surprised when the negative implications of un<strong>de</strong>rfundingultimately materialize (Franzoni and Marín 2006). Previous studies consi<strong>de</strong>r managers’choice to overfund or un<strong>de</strong>rfund their plans (Phillips 2003), the association of pensionplan status and capital expenditures (Rauh 2006) and the association betweensystematic equity risk and the risk of pension plans (Jin, Merton, Bodie 2006).One of the most recent studies is Franzoni and Marín (2006). They examinewhether the market value of the firms sponsoring DB plans reflects their pensionliabilities and find significant evi<strong>de</strong>nce of overvaluation <strong>for</strong> firms with severelyun<strong>de</strong>rfun<strong>de</strong>d pension plans. They show that the portfolio with the most un<strong>de</strong>rfun<strong>de</strong>dfirms earns low raw returns relative to portfolios of firms with healthier pension plans.They interpret this evi<strong>de</strong>nce as being due to investors not paying enough attention tothe implications of the current un<strong>de</strong>rfunding <strong>for</strong> future earnings and cash flows andbeing surprised by the negative impact of the un<strong>de</strong>rfunding on earnings and cash flows.Carroll and Niehaus (1998) empirically examine the relationship between corporate <strong>de</strong>btratings and pension funding. They find evi<strong>de</strong>nce that indicates that unfun<strong>de</strong>d pensionobligations reduce <strong>de</strong>bt ratings more than an equivalent amount of excess pensionassets increase in <strong>de</strong>bt ratings. According to the authors, this relationship is consistentwith the view that an unfun<strong>de</strong>d pension obligation is a corporate liability that comparesto other <strong>de</strong>bt claims. In accordance with this, Stefanescu (2005) reexamines firms’structure of liabilities and integrate pension plans as fully owned subsidiaries to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!