20.07.2013 Views

Ecole doctorale de Physique de la région Parisienne (ED107)

Ecole doctorale de Physique de la région Parisienne (ED107)

Ecole doctorale de Physique de la région Parisienne (ED107)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 Spectral methods and vectorial equations<br />

B.2.3 Boundary conditions<br />

It was already exp<strong>la</strong>ined how to impose BC for the divergence-free case. For the system<br />

of Equations (B.20) or the Equation (B.24), it is worth distinguishing the two cases :<br />

either the enthalpy vanishes or does not vanish at the boundary of the integration domain.<br />

Here we will only consi<strong>de</strong>r the case of EE. In<strong>de</strong>ed, for NSE we chose to take a viscosity<br />

that vanishes at the surface to avoid the need of further BC.<br />

If H0 |r=1 > 0, the solution is quite easy : the Equation (B.24) or the system of Equations<br />

(B.20) admit a homogeneous solution that can be used to satisfy one BC.<br />

If H0(1) vanishes, the system of Equations (B.20) or the Equation (B.24) are <strong>de</strong>generate<br />

and therefore no BC can be imposed. But we shall show that, in this case, the correct<br />

BC are automatically satisfied.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, consi<strong>de</strong>r first the case of the linearized exact system of Equations (B.20). On<br />

the surface of the nonperturbed star, we have ∂th + W · ∇H0 which is the correct BC.<br />

The surface H0 + h = 0 then <strong>de</strong>fines the profile of the perturbed star. To show that the<br />

solution in the ane<strong>la</strong>stic approximation also satisfies the BC, it is more convenient to first<br />

examine the nonlinear case. Here, h is not infinitesimal, and the Equation (B.23) must be<br />

rep<strong>la</strong>ced with the equation<br />

Γ(H0 + h) div W + W · ∇(H0 + h) = 0 (B.26)<br />

that is satisfied if h is a solution of the nonlinearized Equation (B.24) :<br />

Γ (H0 + h) ∆h − div F j+1/2 + ( ∇h − F j+1/2 ) · ∇(H0 + h) = 0. (B.27)<br />

Once again, the surface of the star is <strong>de</strong>fined by H0 + h = 0. But from the Equation<br />

(B.26) we have the correct BC : W · ∇(H0 + h) |H0+h=0 = 0. The surface of the star is<br />

then an unknown quantity that is <strong>de</strong>termined by the re<strong>la</strong>tion H0 + h = 0 in solving the<br />

Equation (B.27) by iteration. This technique was <strong>de</strong>veloped in a different context in the<br />

already quoted paper Gourgoulhon et al. (2001).<br />

In the linear case, we have Wr = 0 at r = 1 [cf. Equation (B.23)], and the enthalpy<br />

does not vanish on the nonperturbed surface of the star. But once again the free surface of<br />

the star can be obtained by looking for the position where the total enthalpy H0 + h = 0<br />

vanishes. This surface coinci<strong>de</strong>s within first or<strong>de</strong>r quantities with the nonperturbed surface<br />

r = 1. Note that if γ > 0 the pressure P |r=1 ∝ h γ+1 |r=1 vanishes within terms o(h).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!