Grammatiktheorie - German Grammar Group FU Berlin - Freie ...

452 Literaturverzeichnis
putational Linguistics. Proceedings of the Conference. Berlin: Association for Computational
Linguistics, 21–26. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E91-1005.pdf, 21.03.2008.
Beghelli, Filippo und Timothy Stowell (1997), „Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of each and
every“, in: A. Szabolcsi, Hg., Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 71–107.
Behaghel, Otto (1909), „Beziehung zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern“, Indogermanische
Forschungen, 25, 110–142.
Behaghel, Otto (1930), „Von deutscher Wortstellung“, Zeitschrift für Deutschkunde, 44, 81–89.
Behrens, Heike (2009), „Konstruktionen im Spracherwerb“, Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik,
37(3), 427––444.
Bellugi, Ursula, Liz Lichtenberger, Wendy Jones, Zona Lai und Marie St. George (2000), „The
Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses“,
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Supplement), 7–29.
Bender, Emily und Daniel P. Flickinger (1999), „Peripheral Constructions and Core Phenomena:
Agreement in Tag Questions“, in Webelhuth et al. (1999), 199–214.
Bender, Emily M. (2002), Syntactic Variation and Linguistic Competence: The Case of AAVE Copula
Absence. PhD thesis, Stanford University. http://faculty.washington.edu/ebender/dissertation/,
21.05.2004.
Bender, Emily M. (2008a), „Evaluating a Crosslinguistic Grammar Resource: A Case Study of Wambaya“,
in Moore et al. (2008), 977–985. http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/P/P08/P08-1111.pdf,
08.02.2010.
Bender, Emily M. (2008b), „Grammar Engineering for Linguistic Hypothesis Testing“, in:
N. Gaylord, A. Palmer und E. Ponvert, Hgg., Proceedings of the Texas Linguistics Society X Conference:
Computational Linguistics for Less-Studied Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications
ONLINE, 16–36.
Bender, Emily M. (2008c), „Radical Non-Configurationality without Shuffle Operators: An Analysis
of Wambaya“, in: St. Müller, Hg., Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-
Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, NICT, Keihanna, Japan. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications,
6–24. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/9/, 31.10.2008.
Bender, Emily M. (2010), „Reweaving a Grammar for Wambaya: A Case Study in Grammar Engineering
for Linguistic Hypothesis Testing“, Linguistic Issues in Language Technology — LiLT,
3(3), 1–34. http://elanguage.net/journals/index.php/lilt/article/view/662, 30.03.2010.
Bender, Emily M., Dan Flickinger, Frederik Fouvry und Melanie Siegel, Hgg. (2003), Proceedings
of the ESSLLI 2003 Workshop “Ideas and Strategies for Multilingual Grammar Development”.
Vienna, Austria.
Bender, Emily M., Daniel P. Flickinger und Stephan Oepen (2002), „The Grammar Matrix: An
Open-Source Starter-Kit for the Rapid Development of Cross-Linguistically Consistent Broad-
Coverage Precision Grammars“, in: J. Carroll, N. Oostdijk und R. Sutcliffe, Hgg., Proceedings of
the Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation at the 19th International Conference on
Computational Linguistics. Taipei, Taiwan, 8–14.
Bender, Emily M. und Melanie Siegel (2005), „Implementing the Syntax of Japanese Numeral
Classifiers“, in Su et al. (2005), 626–635. http://www.melaniesiegel.de/publications/
syntax-of-numeral-classifiers.pdf, 31.05.2010.
Bergen, Benjamin K. und Nancy Chang (2005), „Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-
Based Language Understanding“, in: J.-O. Östman und M. Fried, Hgg., Construction Grammars:
Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Co., 147–190.
Berman, Judith (1996), „Eine LFG-Grammatik des Deutschen“, in Berman und Frank (1996), 11–
96.
Literaturverzeichnis 453
Berman, Judith (1999), „Does German Satisfy the Subject Condition?“, in Butt und King (1999).
http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/4/, 24.11.1999.
Berman, Judith (2003a), Clausal Syntax of German, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, [Studies in
Constraint-Based Lexicalism].
Berman, Judith (2003b), „Zum Einfluss der strukturellen Position auf die syntaktische Funktion der
Komplementsätze“, Deutsche Sprache, 3, 263–286.
Berman, Judith (2007), „Functional Identification of Complement Clauses in German and the
Specification of COMP“, in: A. Zaenen, J. Simpson, T. H. King, J. Grimshaw, J. Maling und
C. Manning, Hgg., Architectures, Rules, and Preferences. Variations on Themes by Joan W. Bresnan.
Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Berman, Judith und Anette Frank (1996), Deutsche und französische Syntax im Formalismus der
LFG, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, [Linguistische Arbeiten 344].
Berwick, Robert C. (1982), „Computational Complexity and Lexical-Functional Grammar“, American
Journal of Computational Linguistics, 8(3–4), 97–109.
Berwick, Robert C. und Partha Niyogi (1996), „Learning from Triggers“, Linguistic Inquiry,
27, 605–622.
Bickerton, Derek (1984a), „Creol is Still King“, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 212–218.
Bickerton, Derek (1984b), „The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis“, The Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 7(2), 173–188.
Bickerton, Derek (1997), „How to Acquire Language without Positive Evidence: What Acquisitionists
Can Learn from Creoles“, in: M. DeGraff, Hg., Language Creation and Language Change:
Creolization, Diachrony, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 49–74, [Learning, Development,
and Conceptual Change].
Bierwisch, Manfred (1963), Grammatik des deutschen Verbs, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, [studia
grammatica II].
Bierwisch, Manfred (1992), „Grammatikforschung in der DDR: Auch ein Rückblick“, Linguistische
Berichte, 139, 169–181.
Bildhauer, Felix (2008), Representing Information Structure in an HPSG Grammar of Spanish. PhD
thesis, Universität Bremen.
Bird, Steven und Ewan Klein (1994), „Phonological Analysis in Typed Feature Systems“, Computational
Linguistics, 20(3), 455–491. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/~ewan/Papers/, 06.01.2006.
Bishop, Dorothy V.M. (2002), „Putting language genes in perspective“, TRENDS in Genetics, 18(2).
Blackburn, Patrick, Claire Gardent und Wilfried Meyer-Viol (1993), „Talking about Trees“, in Krauwer
et al. (1993), 21–29.
Blackburn, Patrick und Johan Bos (2005), Representation and Inference for Natural Language. A
First Course in Computational Semantics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Błaszczak, Joanna und Hans-Martin Gärtner (2005), „Intonational Phrasing, Discontinuity, and the
Scope of Negation“, Syntax, 8(1), 1–22.
Block, Hans-Ulrich und Rudolf Hunze (1986), „Incremental Construction of C- and F-Structure in
a LFG-Parser“, in Nagao (1986), 490–493.
Bloom, Paul (1993), „Grammatical Continuity in Language Development: The Case of Subjectless
Sentences“, Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), 721–734.
Bobaljik, Jonathan (1999), „Adverbs: The Hierarchy Paradox“, Glot International, 4(9/10), 27–28.
Bod, Rens (2009a), „Constructions at Work or at Rest?“, Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 129–134.
Bod, Rens (2009b), „From Exemplar to Grammar: Integrating Analogy and Probability in Language
Learning“, Cognitive Science, 33(4), 752–793. http://staff.science.uva.nl/~rens/analogy.pdf,
15.07.2008.
Bögel, Tina, Miriam Butt und Sebastian Sulger (2008), „Urdu Ezafe and the Morphology-Syntax
Interface“, in Butt und King (2008), 129–149. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/13/lfg08.
html, 23.01.2009.