29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

One view of price restrictions is that they help prevent “bear raids,” or that they make it<br />

more difficult for would-be manipulators to drive prices down below their true values. On the<br />

other hand, price restrictions might also make it more difficult for short sellers to move prices<br />

back toward their true value in response to upward manipulations. Because price restrictions are<br />

inherently short-term constraints, any substantive impact on the susceptibility of securities to<br />

manipulation is most likely to be manifest at short horizons. For this reason, we focus our<br />

investigation on price patterns that might indicate manipulative behavior at a daily or intraday<br />

frequency. To explore these issues, we proceed along three avenues of investigation.<br />

First, to the extent that price restrictions create an environment less conducive to price<br />

patterns that might indicate downward manipulation and more conducive to price patterns that<br />

might indicate upward manipulations, we might expect to observe more extreme negative<br />

returns, and fewer extreme positive returns, for pilot stocks than for control stocks. To<br />

investigate this, we use our control-sample methodology to test whether the skewness of the<br />

returns distribution of short-horizon returns differs across pilot and control stocks. 16 Our results<br />

indicate no statistically significant impact of the pilot program on return skewness, measured at<br />

five-minute, thirty-minute, or one-day return intervals.<br />

Second, we identify positive and negative price “spikes,” or instances when extreme price<br />

moves are reversed shortly afterwards, and examine whether the frequency of positive and<br />

negative spikes differs across pilot and control stocks. We find that at a short (five-minute)<br />

horizon, pilot stocks tend to experience more price reversals than control stocks, but that this<br />

result is the same for negative and positive price reversals. At a thirty-minute horizon, we find<br />

no evidence that there are more price reversals for pilot stocks than control stocks.<br />

16 Bris, Goetzmann, and Zhu (2004), in a study of the effects of short sale regulations around the world, find<br />

evidence suggesting that short selling constraints can affect the skewness of the returns distribution.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 9<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!