29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

in Panel B. Panel B also shows that the ask depth is augmented about three round lots more<br />

when a tick test applies than when a bid test applies.<br />

The bid depth results in Table 6 are slightly different than the ask depth results. The bid<br />

depth increases for all sub-samples, but the difference between the pilot and control samples is<br />

not significant in Panel A, while Panel B suggests that the bid depth of the pilot stocks does not<br />

increase as much as the bid depth of the control stocks. This effect is larger for Nasdaq NM<br />

Stocks than for Listed Stocks, therefore, the bid test seems to augment the bid depth more than<br />

the tick test does by about one round lot.<br />

We examine two measures of quoted spread. The first, known as the “absolute spread,”<br />

is simply the difference between the ask price and the bid price, measured in pennies. The<br />

second, called the “relative spread,” is the absolute spread divided by the bid-ask midpoint, thus<br />

measuring the displayed cost to trade as a percentage of the stock’s value. Panel A shows that<br />

the quoted spreads did not change much when the pilot started for either the pilot stocks or the<br />

control stocks. Only the relative quoted spread in control stocks saw an increase but that<br />

increase was not statistically different from the change in relative spreads experienced by the<br />

pilot stocks. The conclusions from Panel B give a more mixed picture. Quoted spreads decline<br />

about 0.3 cents more for pilot stocks, a result that is the same for Listed Stocks and Nasdaq NM<br />

Stocks. This result suggests that the tick and bid tests appear to reduce liquidity. However, the<br />

results on relative quoted spreads yield the opposite conclusion. While these results are<br />

statistically significant, the point estimates are fairly small. The quoted spreads decline by less<br />

than half a penny and the relative quoted spread increases by less than a basis point. Taken<br />

together, these results suggest that the tick and bid tests have a slight effect on quoted spreads, if<br />

any.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 41<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!