29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

sales can now execute on downticks. This effect should be more obvious in Listed Stocks than<br />

Nasdaq NM Stocks where the trades occur on downticks half the time even with the bid test.<br />

A second potential mechanical effect is the percentage of time during the day when the<br />

most recent bid change was downward. Table 2 shows that this figure is around 39% when the<br />

tick test applies and 47% when the bid test applies. Removing either price restriction could<br />

increase the percentage of the day with down bids because short sales can more easily hit the bid<br />

to force more downbids. Conversely, if the different price restrictions can explain some of the<br />

divergence in these figures, we expect the percentage of downbids in Listed Stocks and Nasdaq<br />

NM Stocks to converge.<br />

Table 5 shows how the tick and bid tests affect trading and quoting mechanics. The<br />

downtick rows in Panel A show that the percentage of trades on downticks increases from 46%<br />

to almost 50% in pilot Listed Stocks. Conversely, the percentage of trades on downticks in<br />

control Listed Stocks goes down. On net, the percentage of trades on downticks is fairly<br />

balanced when the tick test does not apply and is skewed toward upticks when the tick test does<br />

apply. Nasdaq NM Stocks appear to have much more balanced trading even with the bid test so<br />

that removing the bid test results smaller increase in the number of downticks. Panel B confirms<br />

the result that the tick test has a much larger effect on trading mechanics than the bid test.<br />

The downbid rows in Table 5 measure the percentage of the trading day during which the<br />

most recent bid change was downward. Pilot Listed Stocks experience a small increase in the<br />

prevalence of downbids but this increase is roughly similar to an increase experienced by control<br />

Listed Stocks. The results show a decline in the prevalence of downbids for pilot Nasdaq NM<br />

Stocks, suggesting that short selling under the bid test might shorten the duration of upbids,<br />

reflecting the restriction that short sales can only hit upbids.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 39<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!