29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reg SHO Pilot Report 2/12/2007<br />

regression-based tests, but is significant for Nasdaq NM Stocks only in the regression-based tests<br />

in Panel B. Panel B also shows that the ask depth is augmented about three round lots more<br />

when a tick test applies than when a bid test applies.<br />

The bid depth results in Table 6 are slightly different than the ask depth results. The bid<br />

depth increases for all sub-samples, but the difference between the pilot and control samples is<br />

not significant in Panel A, while Panel B suggests that the bid depth of the pilot stocks does not<br />

increase as much as the bid depth of the control stocks. This effect is larger for Nasdaq NM<br />

Stocks than for Listed Stocks, therefore, the bid test seems to augment the bid depth more than<br />

the tick test does by about one round lot.<br />

We examine two measures of quoted spread. The first, known as the “absolute spread,”<br />

is simply the difference between the ask price and the bid price, measured in pennies. The<br />

second, called the “relative spread,” is the absolute spread divided by the bid-ask midpoint, thus<br />

measuring the displayed cost to trade as a percentage of the stock’s value. Panel A shows that<br />

the quoted spreads did not change much when the pilot started for either the pilot stocks or the<br />

control stocks. Only the relative quoted spread in control stocks saw an increase but that<br />

increase was not statistically different from the change in relative spreads experienced by the<br />

pilot stocks. The conclusions from Panel B give a more mixed picture. Quoted spreads decline<br />

about 0.3 cents more for pilot stocks, a result that is the same for Listed Stocks and Nasdaq NM<br />

Stocks. This result suggests that the tick and bid tests appear to reduce liquidity. However, the<br />

results on relative quoted spreads yield the opposite conclusion. While these results are<br />

statistically significant, the point estimates are fairly small. The quoted spreads decline by less<br />

than half a penny and the relative quoted spread increases by less than a basis point. Taken<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!