29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Market efficiency and price discovery<br />

General<br />

DRAFT<br />

Several comment letters acknowledge that short selling is also a necessary tool in price<br />

discovery and market efficiency, particularly where a security is perceived by the market<br />

to be overvalued (NYSE, BATS, CBOE, Citadel Investment Group, Wolverine among<br />

others). As with the market quality evidence, most of the analysis on market efficiency<br />

and price discovery focuses on short sale restrictions in general, not necessarily on the<br />

uptick-type restrictions. Overall, these analyses fail to provide empirical evidence on how<br />

much an uptick restriction, as opposed to a ban, would impede short selling, therefore<br />

providing little support for their arguments.<br />

Several studies conclude that short sellers improve the price discovery process to help<br />

keep markets efficient (Citadel, Coalition of Private Investment Companies, and Autore).<br />

For instance, Citadel Investment Group provides some evidence that the price discovery<br />

process did not operate efficiently when the short sale ban was in place, harming the<br />

investors who may pay prices that are unrelated to issuer fundamentals. Their analysis<br />

concludes that the frequency of distorted price movements during the short sale ban is<br />

consistent with the academic study showing that a significant number of buyers paid<br />

inflated prices because of the inability of liquidity providers to sell short, (Lawrence E.<br />

Harris, Ethan Narnvar & Blake Phillips, Price Inflation and Wealth Transfer during the<br />

2008 <strong>SEC</strong> Short-Sale Ban, 2009). We caution that the prices of banned stocks may depend<br />

on factors that the authors did not model so that the inflation they estimate may be due to<br />

factors other than the <strong>SEC</strong> ban. Coalition of Private Investment Companies and Goldman,<br />

Sachs & Co cite the research of Jonathan Karpoff and Xiaoxia Lou, (Do Short Sellers<br />

Detect Overpriced Firms? Evidence from <strong>SEC</strong> Enforcement Actions, Working paper.<br />

2008) that indicates that short sellers are able to anticipate the misrepresentation of<br />

financial information by companies before it is publicly revealed. In addition, Don<br />

Autore illustrates empirically that binding short sale constraints lead to overpricing<br />

especially when the level of disagreement in the market is higher. However, this<br />

conclusion is based on an analysis of analyst forecasts, which vary infrequently, making<br />

the forecasts not very useful to draw conclusions in short periods of high market<br />

turbulence such as the one analyzed by Don Autore.<br />

4<br />

<strong>SEC</strong>_<strong>OEA</strong>_<strong>FCIC</strong>_001763

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!