29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

prevalent in a world where prices are manipulated, and investigate to see if these price patterns<br />

are more common for pilot stocks than control stocks. Such a pattern does not necessarily mean<br />

that manipulation has occurred, but indicates that we might have cause for further analysis.<br />

As argued above in section I-B, if price restrictions inhibit manipulation by short sellers<br />

and/or facilitate upward manipulation, we might expect to see more large, sudden price declines<br />

and more price increases in pilot stocks than control stocks. If so, this should be reflected in the<br />

form of decreased skewness in the short-term returns distribution.<br />

Table 10 reports results of statistical tests based on 5-minute, 30-minute, and 1-day<br />

returns. For each returns horizon, we follow the same approach as before and test for changes in<br />

skewness between the Pre-Pilot Period and Pilot Period, separately for pilot and control stocks,<br />

and for Listed and Nadaq stocks, and then test whether the difference of differences is<br />

significantly different from zero.<br />

As the table indicates, we find no significant changes between the Pre-Pilot Period and<br />

Pilot Period, with the single exception that there appears to have been a marginally significant<br />

decline in the skewness of Listed pilot stocks at the 30-minute return interval. However, neither<br />

in this nor any other case do we find any statistically significant differences between pilot and<br />

control stocks. Thus, we find no evidence that the pilot program has had any impact on returns<br />

skewness. The results reported in Table 10 are based on the skewness of returns computed using<br />

trade prices. 55<br />

Our second approach to testing whether eliminating price restrictions may lead to an<br />

increase in price patterns indicative of market manipulation involving short sales is to examine<br />

the relative frequency of large negative and positive price reversals, as explained in section V-C,<br />

55 We also performed the test using returns computed using quote midpoints (results not reported) and again found<br />

no significant differences between pilot and control stocks. Using this alternative measure, the point estimates<br />

indicate an even smaller difference than indicated in Table 9.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 48<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!