29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

Third, we use a time-series regression methodology to measure the extent to which<br />

positive and negative price changes are likely to be subsequently reversed. If price rules play an<br />

important role in preventing short sellers from temporarily driving prices down below their fair<br />

value, we would expect to see a larger portion of negative returns subsequently reversed for the<br />

pilot stocks than the control stocks. For Listed Stocks, we find that a larger portion of both<br />

negative and positive returns are subsequently reversed for pilot stocks than control stocks at a<br />

short (five-minute) horizon. The symmetry of these results is consistent with the increase in<br />

volatility discussed above rather than any marked increase in the potential for downward price<br />

pressure. On the other hand, a marked increase in the potential for downward price pressure<br />

relative to upward price pressure should lead to an asymmetry in positive and negative return<br />

reversal results. We do not find this asymmetry. At a thirty-minute horizon, we find no<br />

statistically significant difference in the magnitude of return reversals for Listed pilot and control<br />

stocks. For Nasdaq NM Stocks, we find no statistically significant difference in the magnitude<br />

of return reversals for pilot and control stocks for either five-minute or thirty-minute intervals.<br />

One important element of the Pilot is the ability to examine whether the tick test affects<br />

stocks of varying sizes and volume differently. For example, does the tick test affect larger<br />

stocks in the same manner as smaller stocks and would the tick test be more effective for large or<br />

small stocks? To examine these questions, we divide the stocks into size, measured as market<br />

capitalization, and volume, measured as trading volume divided by shares outstanding<br />

(turnover), groups and run each of our tests again for each group. For most of our tests, we find<br />

that the tick and bid tests affect stocks the same no matter how large or small or how active are<br />

the stocks. In particular, we find that the tick and bid tests result in a lower percentage of short<br />

sale volume for most size and activity levels. We also find that the tick and bid tests result in<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 10<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!