29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Panel B of Table 6 presents the determinants of the cost of borrowing. For the IPOs for<br />

which data is available, the daily loan fee is calculated as the annualized federal funds rate minus<br />

the rebate rate. We then calculate the weighted average loan fee over the first month of trading<br />

(T+3 to T+24) using the number of shares in our vendor’s data. The average level of the loan fee<br />

in our sample is just slightly lower than Geczy, Musto and Reed (2002) most likely due to the<br />

weighted averaging of the loan fees over the first trading month. The fact that our rebate rates<br />

are within the range documented in Geczy, Musto and Reed (2002) is surprising given that our<br />

sample exhibits much lower first day returns than their sample, which is within the bubble<br />

period.<br />

If the expected cost of borrowing deters short sellers from entering the market on T+0, then<br />

the relationship between the level of short selling on the offer day and loan fees should be<br />

negative. On the contrary, we find that higher loan fees are related to higher, not lower, levels of<br />

short selling and our results provide additional insight into the Geczy, Musto, and Reed (2002)<br />

finding that loan fees are greatest for IPOs with high first day returns. We show that the high<br />

level of short selling on the first trading day is a good predictor of the level of loan fees and<br />

interpret these results as an indication that loan fees appear not to be an impediment to short<br />

selling in IPOs but are likely determined, in part, by the level of short selling.<br />

Although Geczy, Musto and Reed (2002) document a significant relation between loan fees<br />

and IPOs that have zero or negative returns, we find only weak evidence that potential price<br />

support is related to the loan fee. For the sample of IPOs studied here, the lack of consistent<br />

relation between loan fees and price support is consistent with the insignificant relation between<br />

price support and short selling. Interestingly, we find a significant relation between failures to<br />

deliver and loan fees even though the level of failures to deliver and short selling are unrelated.<br />

26<br />

<strong>SEC</strong>_<strong>OEA</strong>_<strong>FCIC</strong>_002477

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!