29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report 2/12/2007<br />

market quality. We are unaware of a previous study that compares the tick test to the bid test.<br />

Several concurrent studies also examine the effect of the Pilot on the tick and bid tests<br />

(Alexander and Peterson (2006), Bai (2006), Diether, Lee, and Werner (2006), and Wu (2006)).<br />

These studies are summarized on Appendix A.<br />

A. Effectiveness of the Rule<br />

1. Shorting in a Declining Market<br />

Several studies examine whether the rules appear to keep short sales from executing in<br />

declining markets. When Rule 10a-1 was adopted in 1938, it was motivated in part by a<br />

Commission study of short selling, based on two weeks of data in 1937. This study found that<br />

when a downtick rule applied, a substantial amount of short selling occurred during periods<br />

when the market was declining. 40 Two subsequent studies produced by staff at the Commission<br />

found that the tick test allows short selling in declining markets. 41 The Commission’s 1963<br />

Special Study concluded that Rule 10a-1 was not effective at achieving its objectives, stating that<br />

[p]resent rules appear inadequate to relieve the added pressure that short selling<br />

may create during a severe decline in the general market or a declining price trend<br />

in a particular security. Despite the rules, a relatively large volume of short selling<br />

occurred in particular stocks, including "market leaders" and "trading favorites,"<br />

during the period of decline preceding the market break of May 28, 1962, and at<br />

critical junctures on that day, and many additional opportunities existed when<br />

short selling could have occurred. 42<br />

In a more recent study, Ferri, Christophe, and Angel (2004) examine short selling in a<br />

matched sample of Nasdaq National Market stocks, which were subject to the bid test, and<br />

Nasdaq SmallCap stocks, which were not, during a period of high volatility and rapidly declining<br />

40 The NYSE had a downtick rule prior to the Commission’s tick test. A downtick rule is a weaker form of the tick<br />

test because it allows trading at the most recent price even if that price was a downtick.<br />

41 The Securities and Exchange Commission (1963), in the Special Study, examined the trading activity leading up<br />

to and during the market break of May 28, 1962. In a working paper by <strong>SEC</strong> staff, Marcotte and Martin (1977)<br />

study the tick test for the period from September 20 through October 15, 1976, during which time the Dow Jones<br />

Industrial Average fell by 8.12%. The results are summarized in Pollack (1986).<br />

42 88 th Congress, HR Doc No 88-95 (1 st session, 1963), pp. 293-294.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!