29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report 2/12/2007<br />

In 1976, the Commission proposed three alternative temporary rules that would have<br />

suspended the tick test for some or all registered securities. 27 In response to the proposal, several<br />

market participants, including the NYSE, opposed the proposal, and expressed concerns that<br />

abolishing the tick test might lead to increased volatility or decreased liquidity. The Commission<br />

withdrew the proposals in 1980. 28<br />

A House Report submitted by the Committee on Government Operations dated<br />

December 6, 1991 discusses several aspects of short selling, including the tick test. 29 The report<br />

suggests that short selling has negative price effects that “can have important and lasting<br />

consequences” and asserts that the tick test is “effective in stabilizing the market for exchange-<br />

listed stocks for the benefit of issuers and investors,” although no evidence is cited in support of<br />

this view. The report also recommends that the tick test should be extended to the Nasdaq<br />

market.<br />

On September 6, 1994, the Commission approved NASD Rule 3350 (the “bid test”) as a<br />

temporary rule. 30 This created a bid test for trades executed by NASD members or their<br />

customers, but with exemptions for both equity and option market makers. Specifically, this rule<br />

prohibited short sales at or below (or less than one penny above) the best bid price whenever the<br />

prevailing inside bid price is lower than the previous inside bid. The bid test might appear less<br />

restrictive than the tick test, because it allows for unrestricted short selling at any price when the<br />

bid price is higher than the previous bid, and because of the market maker exemptions. Since its<br />

27 See <strong>SEC</strong> Release No. 13091, December 21, 1976.<br />

28 See <strong>SEC</strong> Release No. 34-42037, October 20, 1999.<br />

29 Short-Selling Activity in the Stock Market: Market Effects and the Need for Regulation (<strong>Part</strong> 1) (House Report),<br />

H.R. Rep. No. 102-414 (1991), reprinted in CCH Federal Securities Law Reports Number 1483 <strong>Part</strong> II (1992).<br />

30 See <strong>SEC</strong> Release No. 34-34277, July 6, 1994.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!