29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

B. Market Quality<br />

1. Liquidity Measures<br />

Because price restrictions alter how orders transact with each other, they have the<br />

potential to alter traditional measures of liquidity. In particular, the price restrictions will often<br />

keep a short sale from executing against the bid quote. Therefore, we expect the depth at the bid<br />

quote to be lower without price restrictions. If a short sale can not execute against the bid, it<br />

often adds depth to the ask quote, and hence, the depth of the ask might be lower without price<br />

restrictions. Alternatively, a restricted short sale might set a lower ask price and an unrestricted<br />

short sale might exhaust the depth at the bid resulting in a lower bid price. Either way, short sale<br />

price restrictions can result in a narrower quoted bid-ask spread.<br />

While quoted spreads and depths measure the displayed supply of liquidity, the effective<br />

spread measures liquidity actually available to investors. Therefore, an examination of effective<br />

spreads is necessary to understand the effect of price restrictions on liquidity. Because price<br />

restrictions can affect the displayed liquidity, we might also expect them to affect the actual<br />

liquidity as well.<br />

Table 6 shows results on the effect of price restrictions on liquidity. For the pilot sample,<br />

the ask depth decreases for Listed Stocks but increases for Nasdaq NM Stocks. The control<br />

sample experiences an increase in depth at the ask. Comparing the changes reveals that the ask<br />

depth of the pilot stocks decreased relative to the ask depth for the control stocks in both Listed<br />

and Nasdaq NM Stocks. This change is significant for Listed Stocks in both the univariate and<br />

regression-based tests, but is significant for Nasdaq NM Stocks only in the regression-based tests<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 40<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!