29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

market quality. We are unaware of a previous study that compares the tick test to the bid test.<br />

Several concurrent studies also examine the effect of the Pilot on the tick and bid tests<br />

(Alexander and Peterson (2006), Diether, Lee, and Werner (2006), and Wu (2006)). These<br />

studies are summarized on Appendix A.<br />

A. Effectiveness of the Rule<br />

1. Shorting in a Declining Market<br />

Several studies examine whether the rules appear to keep short sales from executing in<br />

declining markets. When Rule 10a-1 was adopted in 1938, it was motivated in part by a<br />

Commission study of short selling, based on two weeks of data in 1937. This study found that<br />

when a downtick rule applied, a substantial amount of short selling occurred during periods<br />

when the market was declining. 40 Two subsequent studies produced by staff at the Commission<br />

found that the tick test allows short selling in declining markets. 41 The Commission’s 1963<br />

Special Study concluded that Rule 10a-1 was not effective at achieving its objectives, stating that<br />

[p]resent rules appear inadequate to relieve the added pressure that short selling<br />

may create during a severe decline in the general market or a declining price trend<br />

in a particular security. Despite the rules, a relatively large volume of short selling<br />

occurred in particular stocks, including "market leaders" and "trading favorites,"<br />

during the period of decline preceding the market break of May 28, 1962, and at<br />

critical junctures on that day, and many additional opportunities existed when<br />

short selling could have occurred. 42<br />

In a more recent study, Ferri, Christophe, and Angel (2004) examine short selling in a<br />

matched sample of Nasdaq National Market stocks, which were subject to the bid test, and<br />

Nasdaq SmallCap stocks, which were not, during a period of high volatility and rapidly declining<br />

40 The NYSE had a downtick rule prior to the Commission’s tick test. A downtick rule is a weaker form of the tick<br />

test because it allows trading at the most recent price even if that price was a downtick.<br />

41 The Securities and Exchange Commission (1963), in the Special Study, examined the trading activity leading up<br />

to and during the market break of May 28, 1962. In a working paper by <strong>SEC</strong> staff, Marcotte and Martin (1977)<br />

study the tick test for the period from September 20 through October 15, 1976, during which time the Dow Jones<br />

Industrial Average fell by 8.12%. The results are summarized in Pollack (1986).<br />

42 88 th Congress, HR Doc No 88-95 (1 st session, 1963), pp. 293-294.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 17<br />

DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!