29.03.2013 Views

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SEC Follow Up Exhibits Part C SEC_OEA_FCIC_001760-2501

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reg SHO Pilot Report DRAFT 9/14/2006<br />

Study Diether, Lee, and Werner<br />

(2006)<br />

Efficiency<br />

Returns<br />

Conclusion While the suspension of the<br />

NYSE tick test is found to be<br />

associated with larger spreads<br />

and higher short-term volatility,<br />

this evidence is consistent with<br />

the distorting effects of the tick<br />

test on short sellers (i.e., forcing<br />

them to be liquidity suppliers)<br />

rather than any benefit to<br />

investor welfare.<br />

Alexander and Peterson (2006) Wu (2006) <strong>SEC</strong><br />

No impact except for the following<br />

measures for NYSE stocks:<br />

higher autocorrelation of fiveminute<br />

returns, greater likelihood<br />

of a lower price for the second<br />

trade after a short sale, and<br />

greater likelihood of a higher<br />

trade price for the first trade after<br />

a short sale. The authors<br />

examine the autocorrelation of<br />

five- and thirty-minute returns,<br />

upside minus downside r-<br />

squared, and price runs.<br />

No significant impact on returns<br />

surrounding the announcement<br />

date of the Pilot stocks, on the<br />

initiation day of the Pilot, or during<br />

the first month of the Pilot.<br />

Concerns about the removal of<br />

the price tests leading to a<br />

degradation of market quality are<br />

unfounded. Price tests do not<br />

further the stated objectives of<br />

short sale regulation.<br />

Hasbrouck pricing errors<br />

show no significant change<br />

with pilot.<br />

Intraday return<br />

autocorrelations (30 and 60<br />

minute) did not change with<br />

pilot.<br />

Tick test reduces short selling<br />

and narrows the spread<br />

primarily for small stocks.<br />

Tick test does not seriously<br />

constrain short sellers from<br />

trading on their information.<br />

Higher five-minute return<br />

reversals.<br />

Higher five-minute semiautoregression.<br />

No impact on thirty-minute<br />

return reversals, thirty-minute<br />

semi-autocorrelation, or on<br />

skewness in five-minute, thirtyminute,<br />

and daily returns.<br />

Listed pilot stocks had a 24<br />

bps lower return than control<br />

stocks on the initiation day of<br />

the Pilot but had statistically<br />

similar cumulative return during<br />

the 6 months after the Pilot.<br />

Prepared by the Office of Economic Analysis 88 DRAFT<br />

Most evidence shows that the<br />

pilot had a minor effect. The<br />

most intriguing results are in<br />

volatility. Some evidence that<br />

the tick test has a bigger effect<br />

in small stocks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!