02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 125<br />

It is probable that Zechariah 4 was compiled in at least two stages. 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> texts that we may consider to be redactional units are:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> final text as we have it.<br />

2. Verses l-6a0 + 10acx-14.<br />

Verse 12 may have been absent from 2 and even 1 at some time. It<br />

is not clear what it is meant to add (clarification or confusion?); it<br />

does pick up one expression, T3, from the middle section of the<br />

chapter, although it refers to the two minus (which must have some<br />

connection with the two olive trees) rather than simply Zerubbabel;<br />

and it is used in the sense of 'beside' and not 'in the hand of.<br />

<strong>The</strong> final redactor intended the readers to note, not only the<br />

promises from Yahweh to the effect that he will restore Jerusalem,<br />

but that:<br />

1. Joshua the priest has a special function in Yahweh's purposes.<br />

2. Zerubbabel either is 'the Branch' or represents him.<br />

3. Zerubbabel will finish the Temple.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> people will know that Yahweh has sent someone to<br />

them. 2<br />

We have already strayed, inevitably, into the proper subject matter<br />

of Chapter 4, since chs. 3 and 4 must be interpreted together with 6.9-<br />

15. Accordingly I defer further discussion. 3<br />

1. This is the view of most scholars and is assumed here, although I do not<br />

think we have very much evidence of the sort of literary construction that might be<br />

received in a vision. Our main concern is to understand the significance of the structure.<br />

Opinions vary about this. Petersen regards these verses as pro-Zerubbabel against<br />

Joshua, and since ch. 4 as a whole regards the two as on a par, it was necessary to<br />

insert vv. 6a-10a at this point. <strong>The</strong> Meyers' believe that 6b-10a was placed here<br />

deliberately to separate the two parts of the vision, and this emphasizes its importance;<br />

it was added early by Zechariah or (less probably) a disciple; since<br />

Zerubbabel's title and patronymic are consistently omitted, unlike Haggai, we must<br />

assume that Zechariah's view was that a Davidide would only become king again in<br />

the future, after Zerubbabel's time.<br />

2. See on 2.5-17 above.<br />

3. See the section on Zech. 3 in Chapter 4 below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!