02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 237<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> clearest, most elaborately structured passages are found in<br />

the sections reckoned to be redactional by the majority of scholars. At<br />

the least, this points to a different kind of literary activity in<br />

describing the visions and in the rest of the presentation. 1<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> structuring discernible in Zechariah 9-14 seems different<br />

from and less precise than that found in Zechariah 1-8. <strong>The</strong> small<br />

units specified on form-critical grounds yield very little, and it is<br />

obvious that there are more contacts outside the units than within<br />

them.<br />

4. Negatively, the structures proposed by Lamarche, Lacocque,<br />

Otzen and Hanson do not stand up to critical scrutiny. Yet there are<br />

signs of a unified plan for these parts of the book:<br />

a. <strong>The</strong>re are links between the different parts of Zech. 9.1-<br />

11.3; there is evidence of progression of thought over long<br />

sections achieved in small steps by repeated words.<br />

b. Zech. 11.4-17 + 13.7-9 contains some very obscure<br />

elements, and does not form an obviously recognizable<br />

pattern. Yet its overall movement is clear and logical. We<br />

have yet to discover the reason for the separation of these<br />

two passages.<br />

c. Zech. 12.1-13.6 contains material more akin to chs. 1-8, in<br />

its construction, than anything found previously.<br />

d. Zechariah 14 shows clear progression of thought; some sort<br />

of overall chiastic pattern, and apparently deliberate use of<br />

distinctive and repeated words to indicate structure and<br />

emphasis.<br />

1. It would be interesting to study the difference between work produced by<br />

visionaries who describe and explain (or supplement in some way) their experiences.<br />

When that is done we may have some clearer ground for saying whether Zechariah<br />

could or could not have edited his own dream visions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!