02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

34-39. <strong>The</strong>se are all concerned with the description of Zechariah's<br />

vision: the man, the horses and the myrtle trees. <strong>The</strong>y do not connect<br />

with any other part of the vision. <strong>The</strong> description 'standing between<br />

the myrtle trees' occurs as a set formula three times—rather oddly in<br />

v. 8 where the man is riding on a horse! Does this indicate a later<br />

extension of the use of the formula? It has some affinity with the other<br />

formula used: 'the angel who spoke with me' (see below).<br />

40. nn may be ignored: two occurrences in a single verse. <strong>The</strong> repetition<br />

seems to be a way of delaying the answer to Zechariah's question<br />

(cf. the more elaborate delay and heightened suspense in 4.5, 13).<br />

42. •jR'pa needs to be noted, despite the fact that its use here is<br />

confined to vv. 9, 11, 12, 13 and 14, where Zechariah's conversation<br />

is described. Elsewhere it is found in 2.2, 7, 7; 3.1, 3, 5, 6; 4.1, 4, 5;<br />

5.5, 10; 6.4, 5; 12.8. Apart from a brief communication between<br />

Yahweh and 'the angel who spoke with me' in v. 13, the angel stays<br />

with Zechariah throughout and is referred to explicitly, in all visions<br />

but the third and sixth, as 'the angel who spoke with me'. In the latter<br />

we find simply 'And he said to me...' In the fourth vision Zechariah<br />

has no conversation with 'the angel who spoke with me', but sees 'the<br />

Angel of Yahweh' (as in 1.11-12). It is possible that there is evidence<br />

of a second author's or an editor's work here.<br />

44. •»]« is emphatic in v. 9 and v. 15b, but refers to the angel in the<br />

former, and to Yahweh in the latter. It seems safe to ignore it.<br />

45. nan. No connection is discernible between the two occurrences<br />

of this common word.<br />

46. nw begins vv. 10, 11, 12 and 13 in the question and answer<br />

section of the vision. <strong>The</strong>se instances give a certain continuity and<br />

serve to mark it off as a separate entity.<br />

47.1'pnnn occurs in vv. 10-11 in the same sense: the horses go to<br />

'patrol' and then report that they have 'patrolled' the earth. Otherwise<br />

in Zechariah the hithpael of the verb is found in 6.7 (3x), and in<br />

10.12. <strong>The</strong> last occurrence does not seem to be related to the others<br />

and an emendation i^nrr is sometimes proposed. 1 <strong>The</strong> other instances<br />

are in the vision which corresponds most closely to this one, namely<br />

the eighth and last: the chariots and horses patrol the earth and set<br />

God's Spirit at rest (6.8).<br />

1. With partial support from one Hebrew manuscript, LXX and Syr.; Otzen,<br />

Studien, p. 252 (who considers it unnecessary) and Jansma, Zechariah 9-14, p. 92.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!