02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 171<br />

a + a' ]'JJ only (nx~i is in b' + a')<br />

b + b' IRQ only (p'rptf, rtro and 30' occur only in b')<br />

On the other hand "i* and ]npi> occur in a + b and b 1 + a 1 respectively.<br />

This could mean that in both halves a place name provides a<br />

link over a break (continuity in discontinuity). However, the material<br />

linked in vv. 2-3 is very different from that linked in vv. 5-7. We<br />

should seem to be resorting to rather desperate conjectures.<br />

When we look at the actual content of vv. 1 and 8, it is difficult to<br />

believe that '<strong>The</strong> word of Yahweh is in the land of Hadrach' is meant<br />

to correspond to 'I will encamp at (? = *?) my house...' One would<br />

have expected at least some verbal clue (e.g. ? TTQ3).<br />

6. Lamarche links this section with 14.16-21. <strong>The</strong> possibly significant<br />

verbal links between the sections are as follows:<br />

mvr 9.7; 14.21 (but also 9.13; 10.3, 6; 11.14; 12 (6x); 14.5, 14)<br />

rva 9.8; 14.20, 21 (but also 10.3, 6, 6; 77.73; 12 (7x); 13.1, 6;<br />

14.2. Instances italicized refer to the Temple).<br />

-1*70 9.5; 14.16, 17 (but also 9.9; 11.6; 14.5, 9, 10. Instances<br />

italicized refer to Yahweh as king).<br />

This does not inspire confidence. <strong>The</strong> theme of Yahweh's kingship is,<br />

however, important and only found explicitly in 9.9 and 14.9, 16-17,<br />

suggesting that further research along these lines might be fruitful.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong>re are several distinctive words and phrases which occur elsewhere<br />

(e.g. msin D'o, D'3 n:>n, ntim la^a). <strong>The</strong>se need to be<br />

accounted for. Further, specific nations are mentioned in 10.10-12 (or<br />

11.1) (Egypt, Assyria and Lebanon) as well as in 14.16-21 (Egypt<br />

alone). Why should we not put 10.10-12 parallel to 14.18-19?<br />

Although Lamarche does not seem to have considered this sort of<br />

possibility, his method implies an answer: the relationship of each passage<br />

as a whole to other whole passages matters more than individual<br />

repeating words. Thus it is true, as he says, that there is a progression<br />

towards universalism. In 9.1-8 the focus is on Israel's near neighbours,<br />

with muted promises about salvation outside Israel/ Judah. In<br />

14.16-21, although Egypt is singled out, the focus is primarily upon<br />

'all the nations'.<br />

It should be interesting to see what results my own proposed<br />

method leads to in comparison with those of Lamarche.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!