02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Division of Zechariah 67<br />

2.77: Injunction to silence<br />

This verse stands apart from both preceding and succeeding verses,<br />

although it is entirely appropriate here, as has been recognized by<br />

Petitjean, Rudolph and others. <strong>The</strong> proposed actions of Yahweh have<br />

been outlined. All flesh should remain in awed silence because he has<br />

roused himself and the earth will no longer be left at rest. We shall<br />

include it with the preceding section for convenience: it is too short<br />

for any other course of action.<br />

3.1-10: <strong>The</strong> Fourth Vision<br />

This vision is unique in several ways, as C. Jeremias (among others) 1<br />

has shown. It begins with »3tm (but cf. 2.3); it is the only vision of<br />

a historical person rather than symbolic persons and things<br />

(notwithstanding the addition of Zerubbabel to Zech. 4); 'the angel<br />

who talked with' Zechariah plays no part, but only the 'angel of<br />

Yahweh' (vv. 1, 6) or simply 'the angel' (v. 4); Zechariah himself<br />

asks no questions but makes a suggestion directly to those concerned<br />

in the vision (v. 5); the meaning of the vision is given implicitly<br />

(vv. 2, 7; cf. 1.9; 2.2 etc.). Jeremias also mentions the fulness of<br />

detail and liveliness of the presentation, which is approached only<br />

otherwise by 2.5-9, and comments on the change that the omission of<br />

3.1-7 makes to the structure of the series (see below). Finally, Joshua<br />

is linked with Zerubbabel in ch. 4, where he does not seem to be so<br />

prominent as he is here (but see 6.11).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se points do not conclusively prove the work of another hand,<br />

since it is not possible to predict the range of variations that a particular<br />

writer might employ—certainly not on the basis of the sample of<br />

Zechariah's work available to us. Still, it is necessary for us to bear in<br />

mind the possibility that 3.1-7 is from a later writer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> case for treating vv. 8-10 as redactional is stronger. Verse 7<br />

forms a satisfactory conclusion to the vision account; v. 8 opens with<br />

an imperative, appropriate to the beginning of a new section, and<br />

introduces elements not mentioned previously, but which are taken for<br />

granted: the men 'of good omen' who sit before Joshua and the 'stone<br />

of seven eyes/springs'. Petitjean regards vv. 8-10 as part of an<br />

original cycle of oracles. Verse 10 itself is a rather traditional<br />

1. Die Nachtgesichte, pp. 201-203.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!