02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

(seen in the completion of the temple, and suggested by the oil and<br />

light in ch. 4) should be seen as a unity.<br />

Zech. 2.12b is interpreted in two main ways.<br />

1. It continues the prophet's speech, giving a reason for the<br />

oracle of Yahweh that is to follow. 1<br />

2. It begins Yahweh's speech, and the irtf must be emended to<br />

*j*y, probably due to the qualms of later copyists who could<br />

not allow such a direct anthropomorphism. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> decision is difficult because both v. 12b and v. 13 begin with »D.<br />

<strong>The</strong> meaning, however, is not seriously in doubt. It is probably<br />

analagous to Deut. 32.10, 3 and it denotes something precious to<br />

Yahweh. Having said all this, I do not think we can claim that this<br />

expression makes any clear link with other parts of the book. <strong>The</strong><br />

passage closest to this is 12.4, which at least refers to Yahweh's eyes,<br />

but uses the plural, and in a different expression.<br />

'This is their "appearance"' was the interpretation of 5.6 favoured<br />

above. <strong>The</strong>re is some affinity between this and 2.12, in that both<br />

passages describe how Yahweh sees the people of the land. However,<br />

the expressions are again different, and the interpretation uncertain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> references in ch. 9 were dealt with above, and there is no clear<br />

connection that can be made with any other place. Those in chs. 11<br />

and 14 both refer to God's judgment, and are distinctive in giving<br />

special mention to the eye. However, the first is singular (and the eye<br />

is specified) and parallel to 'arm'; the second is plural, and associated<br />

with 'flesh' and 'tongues'. <strong>The</strong> first is directed against 'in "rbRn, the<br />

second against the peoples that wage war against Jerusalem. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

could still be connected, but the signs are ambiguous, and we must<br />

ignore them.<br />

1. E.g. Mitchell, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, and Jonah, p. 142.<br />

2. E.g. Petersen, Haggai and Zechariah, p. 173; Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah,<br />

p. 166; Rudolph, Haggai, pp. 86, 88; following E. Robertson, <strong>The</strong> Apple of the<br />

Eye in the Masoretic Text', JTS 38 (1937), pp. 56-59.<br />

3. ri33 only occurs in Zech. 2.12. It is usually related to K33, meaning 'gate' in<br />

Targ. Esth. 5.14, or 333 ('perforate'), hence 'opening'; or else an Arabic word<br />

yielding 'pupil'; Dozy suggested 'baby' (BDB, p. 93). Deut. 32.10 has a different<br />

word, p^K, which signifies preciousness in three out of the five places where it<br />

occurs (+ Prov. 7.2; Ps. 17.8).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!