02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

272 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

fore, is somewhat different, but one can well imagine the author of<br />

9.8 making use of this phrase to express a reversal of fortune for the<br />

people of Israel, and I should not delete this as a gloss, as does BHS<br />

for example. It is difficult to argue for more than this.<br />

This leaves a small group of words which might serve this function:<br />

J?c0% which is used of Yahweh's action for his people, with the niphal<br />

participle in 9.9; K'nn, used of Yahweh's bringing his people to<br />

Jerusalem/from the land of Egypt; D'n^K (see above); and pis, which<br />

is remarkably rare in Zechariah (only 8.8, attached to the important<br />

climax of chs. 7-8, and 9.9, where the adjective pnx refers to the<br />

coming king). It is noticeable that these all occur in 8.7-8, with their<br />

counterparts mostly in a comparatively small compass, 9.7-10.6. It is<br />

also interesting that Mason identified some of these verses as having<br />

affinities with proto-Zechariah. 1 We shall deal with these in connection<br />

with the sections of Zechariah 9-14 since it seems more likely<br />

that its author(s)/editor(s) has/have been influenced by proto-Zechariah<br />

than vice versa.<br />

I conclude that we have found evidence of a connection between<br />

Zechariah 1-8 and 9-14, but not of an overall editing of the whole<br />

book.<br />

Arguments for the Unity of Zechariah<br />

Having looked at the verbal links between each section of Zechariah<br />

1-8 and the rest of the book, we should be in a position to offer an<br />

opinion on the likelihood that the whole of Zechariah 1-14 is a unity.<br />

We have not found evidence in favour of this view, so let us ask if<br />

there actually is evidence that this method does not take account of.<br />

One of the most succinct presentations of arguments for the unity of<br />

Zechariah is given by Joyce Baldwin. 2 She mentions Barnes who notes<br />

the following features:<br />

centrality of Jerusalem<br />

sympathetic attitude to Ephraim<br />

prominent place given to David.<br />

1. See, e.g., Zechariah 9-14, pp. 11, 26-27, 29, 30-31, 36-38, 85-88, 93, 98-<br />

100, 123-24, 124, 127-28; <strong>The</strong> Purpose of the Editorial Framework of the Book of<br />

Haggai,' VT27 (1976), pp. 227-31, 233-36.<br />

2. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, p. 68.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!