02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Connections Between Sections ofZechariah 1-14 245<br />

judgment, 1.17 envisages a scattering that is due to his blessing:<br />

'Again my cities will be scattered—because of good'. 1 It is not clear<br />

how much we can make of this. It might be that the editor of 1.17 was<br />

aware of 13.7, but we need more evidence than we have so far found.<br />

D^KJVT "ira occurs in 1.17, 2.16 and 3.2. <strong>The</strong> first two instances are<br />

clearly redactional. This might mean that the redactor prepared for the<br />

statement of 3.2, 'Yahweh has chosen Jerusalem', by the repeated 'will<br />

again choose Jerusalem' at the end of the first vision and the next pair<br />

of visions. It could, of course, be the case that he was responsible for<br />

all three instances. <strong>The</strong> word in 9.17, onim, is completely different<br />

and may be ignored.<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Of the distinctive words found in ch. 1 and elsewhere in Zechariah 1-8<br />

the greatest number occur in either ch. 6 or chs. 7-8, but there are<br />

some contacts with chs. 2 and 3. In ch. 2 the repetitions are either<br />

concerned with Jerusalem, or else occur in the oracular section 2.10-<br />

16 (the only exceptions being ntoi) and '13). In the case of ch. 3 we<br />

have four words linking 1.4-6 with 3.7-10, plus nar and Dbtfvra ~im<br />

linking 1.8 and 17 with 3.1-7 and 3.2 respectively. <strong>The</strong> only references<br />

outside these sections in chs. 2-8 are aitf in 4.1 and 5.1, which<br />

is different from other occurrences and may be ignored; n"?tf which<br />

occurs in 4.9, part of the editorial section; and nnnjj, 4.14, which may<br />

also be redactional.<br />

<strong>The</strong> contacts between chs. 1, 6, and 7-8 may be divided as follows:<br />

1. Zech. 1.1-6 + 10 (11? 12? 13? 14? 15?)-17 dealing with<br />

Yahweh's past action expressing his wrath and his future<br />

compassion. This has strong contact with Zechariah 7-8 but<br />

little with Zechariah 6.<br />

2. Zech. 1.7-11 dealing with the description of the visions of<br />

horses of various colours and riders/chariots. <strong>The</strong>se verses<br />

have clear parallels in Zechariah 6 but little verbal contact<br />

with Zechariah 7-8.<br />

1. It is better, I think, to keep the meaning 'be scattered' since: (1) it makes for a<br />

very effective surprise with man at the end of the clause; (2) the meaning (over)flow<br />

is only suggested here and in Prov. 5.16 (BOB, p. 807), where it can equally well<br />

mean 'be scattered'; and (3) the picture is consonant with Zech. 2.8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!