02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

178 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

Zechariah9.9-17<br />

We shall first consider words which occur twice or more within 9.9-<br />

17 before looking at vv. 9-10 and 11-17 separately:<br />

m, v. 9.##3,6. This is used in the parallel expressions 'daughter of<br />

Zion/Jerusalem'. It does not occur elsewhere in Zechariah 9-14.<br />

p, vv. 9, 13.##9,12. <strong>The</strong> first of these means 'foal' which is hardly<br />

comparable to the normal use in v. 13. Otherwise it only occurs in<br />

10.7, 9 where the fairly rare TQJ is found, as in 9.13 (otherwise only<br />

10.5). In 9.13 and 10.7, 9 the form is plural with pronominal suffix.<br />

i>0', vv. 9, 16. Otherwise 8.7, 13 (see above), 10.6, 12.7. Verse 9<br />

contains the unusual niphal participle form which refers to Zion's<br />

king. Hiphils occur in the other references in Deutero-Zechariah. In<br />

all cases the agent of salvation is Yahweh.<br />

am, v v. 9, 10, 'riding upon an ass... cut off the chariot'. Some contrast<br />

is indicated in the use of the root am, first as a verb and then as<br />

a noun. However, it is not obvious that this was intended by the writer.<br />

rro (see above on 9.6), v. 10.##1,6, is used in parallel clauses; the<br />

first is hiphil first person singular, while the second is niphal third<br />

person singular. It is not clear what the significance of this might be,<br />

if any, but it is noticeable that a number of words since 9.1 have<br />

occurred close together. It could be that we have some sort of<br />

catchword linkage in operation. ton DJ -iKtfai, 9.7, and Kin ircttn, 9.9,<br />

may well have been noticed in reading aloud.<br />

D'~iSK, vv. 10, 13; plus 10.7 only. This seems to be the first sign of<br />

an interest in the northern kingdom. Each reference is favourable to<br />

Ephraim. Zech. 9.13 has 'Judah and Ephraim'; 10.6 has 'the house of<br />

Judah/Joseph'.<br />

ntfp, vv. 10, 13; plus 10.4. See above on nor^a/ntip, 9.10; 10.3b-5a.<br />

10, v. 10.##14,17. This may be ignored.<br />

TDK, vv. 11, 12. This seems to have no significance for structure. It<br />

may be considered as a catchword.<br />

DV, vv. 12, 16.<br />

K'pn, vv. 13, 15. ntfp seems to be needed for both verbs in v. 13a;<br />

v. 15 is obscure and it is impossible to be sure of any intended<br />

correspondence. 1<br />

1. Rudolph has a novel argument: to shoot one arrow (Ephraim) is of little use.<br />

He proposes to add nsttfK (quiver), omitted by homoioarchton with D'~is«, thus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!