02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 91<br />

It is clear that to delete v. 12 would spoil this pattern. We note also that<br />

the two key words, Dm and on], of vv. 12 and 13 are not taken up until<br />

vv. 16 and 17 respectively. It is possible that they are used in the latter<br />

verses to form a chiasmus and emphasize further vv. 14-15. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

would already be recognized as a climax by the parallel and contrast:<br />

^p becomes nwp for Jerusalem; *]xp for Jerusalem becomes *]2ip for<br />

the nations (cf. also 310 vv. 13, 17; and nto* m.T vv. 12, 14a, 16, 17).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pattern for the speakers during this section may be represented<br />

as follows (where Zech. = Zechariah; As = the angel who spoke with<br />

me; Ay signifies the expression 'angel of Yahweh' ; Mm = man<br />

standing among the myrtle trees; Y = Yahweh; H = horse(man) +<br />

horses?/horsemen?).<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14-15<br />

Zech. to<br />

As to<br />

Mm to<br />

As to<br />

'my lord'<br />

Zech.<br />

(Zech.)<br />

H<br />

Zech.<br />

(Mm?)<br />

to<br />

Ay<br />

Y<br />

Aym<br />

toY<br />

to As<br />

It seems impossible to draw any far-reaching result out of this, but it<br />

seems to confirm that the unit cannot end before v. 14 (and therefore<br />

probably v. 15). Verses 14-17 have the form of oracles, but vv. 14-<br />

15 are more closely related to the vision in that 'the angel who spoke<br />

with me' is the speaker. Speeches are a common feature of the vision<br />

in any case, and the whole of vv. 8ff., would reach an unsatisfactory<br />

end at v. 13.<br />

Verses 16-17, on the other hand, could be detached without causing<br />

a hiatus, and it may be that Rothstein, Sellin, Petitjean, Rudolph and<br />

others are right in separating them. Rignell argued that Zechariah<br />

himself added vv. 16-17 when the visions were first written down. 1<br />

Beuken argued that p 1 ? in v. 16 indicated an announcement that<br />

belonged with the motivation of v. 15. 2 This seems to me to be right,<br />

for someone, whether author or redactor, intended it that way. Who is<br />

to say that it could not have been Zechariah? I do not think that<br />

v. 15b already provides a satisfactory explanation for the menace of<br />

1. Die Nachtgesichte, pp. 57-59.<br />

2. Haggai-Sacharja, pp. 242-43.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!