29.06.2013 Views

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>20</strong>10 on <strong>Form</strong> <strong>20</strong>-F<br />

Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk 167<br />

We continuously analyze potential weaknesses of our value-at-risk model using statistical techniques such as<br />

back-testing, but also rely on risk management experience and expert opinion. Back-testing provides an analysis<br />

of the predictive power of the value-at-risk calculations based on actual experience. We compare the hypothetical<br />

daily profits and losses under the buy-and-hold assumption (in accordance with German regulatory<br />

requirements) with the estimates from our value-at-risk model.<br />

A committee with participation from Market Risk Management, Market Risk Operations, Risk Analytics and<br />

Instruments, Finance and others meets on a quarterly basis to review back-testing results of our Group as a<br />

whole and on individual businesses. The committee analyzes performance fluctuations and assesses the predictive<br />

power of our value-at-risk model, which in turn allows us to improve and adjust the risk estimation<br />

process accordingly.<br />

We are committed to the ongoing development of our proprietary risk models, and we allocate substantial<br />

resources to reviewing and improving them. Special attention is given to improving those parts of the value-atrisk<br />

model that relate to the areas where losses have been experienced in the recent past. During <strong>20</strong>10, improvements<br />

were made to the value-at-risk calculation, including the following:<br />

— Inclusion of Equity Dividend Risk<br />

— Refined methodology for securitization positions<br />

— Inclusion of the market risk of Sal. Oppenheim and BHF-BANK<br />

In addition, we have introduced a process of systematically capturing and evaluating immaterial risks currently<br />

not captured in our value-at-risk model.<br />

Value-at-Risk at Postbank<br />

The Postbank also uses the value-at-risk concept to quantify and monitor the market risk it assumes. Postbank<br />

also uses a Monte Carlo Simulation for calculation of trading book risks across all portfolios, transforming heterogeneous<br />

types of market risk into a single measure of risk. The risk factors taken into account in the value-atrisk<br />

include yield curves, equity prices, foreign exchange rates, and volatilities, along with risks arising from<br />

changes in credit spreads. Correlation effects between the risk factors are derived from historical data.<br />

The Postbank value-at-risk is currently not consolidated into the value-at-risk of the remaining Group.<br />

Economic Capital for Market Risk<br />

Economic capital for market risk measures the amount of capital we need to absorb very severe unexpected<br />

losses arising from our exposures over the period of one year. “Very severe” in this context means that economic<br />

capital is set at a level to cover with a probability of 99.98 % the aggregated unexpected losses within<br />

one year. The market risks from Postbank have been modeled into the Group’s Economic Capital results.<br />

We calculate economic capital using stress tests and scenario analyses. The stress tests are derived from<br />

historically observed severe market shocks. The resulting losses from these stress scenarios are then aggregated<br />

using correlations observed during periods of market crises, to reflect the increase in correlations which<br />

occurs during severe downturns.<br />

The stress tests are augmented by subjective assessments where only limited historical data is available, or<br />

where market developments lead us to believe that historical data may be a poor indicator of possible future<br />

market scenarios.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!