SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

Deutsche Bank Notes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet F-93
Annual Report 2010 on Form 20-F 14 – Financial Instruments carried at Fair Value
The level of subjectivity and degree of management judgment required is more significant for those instruments
valued using specialized and sophisticated models and where some or all of the parameter inputs are not
observable. Management judgment is required in the selection and application of appropriate parameters,
assumptions and modeling techniques. In particular, where data is obtained from infrequent market transactions
then extrapolation and interpolation techniques must be applied. In addition, where no market data is
available then parameter inputs are determined by assessing other relevant sources of information such as
historical data, fundamental analysis of the economics of the transaction and proxy information from similar
transactions and making appropriate adjustment to reflect the actual instrument being valued and current
market conditions. Where different valuation techniques indicate a range of possible fair values for an instrument
then management has to establish what point within the range of estimates best represents the fair value. Further,
some valuation adjustments may require the exercise of management judgment to ensure they achieve fair
value.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The financial instruments carried at fair value have been categorized under the three levels of the IFRS fair value
hierarchy as follows:
Level 1 – Instruments valued using quoted prices in active markets: These are instruments where the fair value
can be determined directly from prices which are quoted in active, liquid markets and where the instrument
observed in the market is representative of that being priced in the Group’s inventory.
These instruments include: high-liquidity treasuries and derivative, equity and cash products traded on highliquidity
exchanges.
Level 2 – Instruments valued with valuation techniques using observable market data: These are instruments
where the fair value can be determined by reference to similar instruments trading in active markets, or where
a technique is used to derive the valuation but where all inputs to that technique are observable.
These instruments include: many OTC (over the counter) derivatives; many investment-grade listed credit bonds;
some CDS’s (credit default swaps); many CDO’s (collateralized debt obligations); and many less-liquid equities.
Level 3 – Instruments valued using valuation techniques using market data which is not directly observable:
These are instruments where the fair value cannot be determined directly by reference to market-observable
information, and some other pricing technique must be employed. Instruments classified in this category have
an element which is unobservable and which has a significant impact on the fair value.
These instruments include: more-complex OTC derivatives; distressed debt; highly-structured bonds; illiquid
ABS (asset-backed securities, including some referencing residential mortgages); illiquid CDO’s (cash and
synthetic); monoline exposures; private equity placements; many CRE (commercial real-estate) loans; illiquid
loans; and some municipal bonds.