29.06.2013 Views

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Notes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet F-125<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>20</strong>10 on <strong>Form</strong> <strong>20</strong>-F 24 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets<br />

In <strong>20</strong>08, an impairment loss of € 304 million was recognized in the income statement as impairment of intangible<br />

assets. The loss related to retail investment management agreements and was recorded in AWM. The impairment<br />

loss was due to a decrease in fair values as a result of declines in market values of invested assets as well as<br />

current and projected operating results and cash flows of investment management agreements. The impairment<br />

related to certain open end and closed end funds. The recoverable amounts of the assets were calculated as<br />

fair value less costs to sell, using the multi-period excess earnings method.<br />

Postbank trademark: As a result of the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Group identified and recognized<br />

in December <strong>20</strong>10 the Postbank trademark amounting to € 382 million (see Note 04 “Acquisitions and<br />

Dispositions”). The asset is allocated to the Private & Business Clients cash-generating unit. Since the<br />

trademark is expected to generate cash flows for an indefinite period of time, it is classified as unamortized<br />

intangible asset. The trademark intangible was valued at fair value based on a preliminary third party valuation<br />

as of the acquisition date which is subject to finalization within the respective measurement period.<br />

In <strong>20</strong>10, there was no indication that the fair value of the Postbank trademark differed from the initial fair value<br />

determination. Since the Postbank consolidation occurred in December <strong>20</strong>10, the determination of the fair value<br />

for this trademark coincided with the regular impairment testing. The fair value of the trademark was determined<br />

based on the income approach, using the relief-from-royalty approach. As the purchase price allocation is<br />

subject to finalization within the regular measurement period, the fair value of the Postbank trademark may<br />

change during the 12-months-period following the acquisition date.<br />

Sal. Oppenheim trademark: The purchase price allocation performed in relation to the acquisition of the Sal.<br />

Oppenheim Group in <strong>20</strong>10 resulted in the identification and recognition of the Sal. Oppenheim trademark<br />

amounting to € 27 million. The asset is allocated to the Private Wealth Management cash-generating unit. The<br />

useful life for the trademark is assumed to be indefinite and, hence, not subject to amortization. The intangible<br />

asset was valued at fair value based upon a third party valuation performed as of the acquisition date.<br />

In <strong>20</strong>10, there was no indication that the fair value of the trademark differed from the fair value determination in<br />

the purchase price allocation. The valuation of the trademark intangible asset was performed in context of the<br />

respective purchase price allocation for the Sal. Oppenheim acquisition. The fair value of the Sal. Oppenheim<br />

trademark was determined using the relief-from-royalty approach.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!