29.06.2013 Views

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SEC Form 20-F - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>20</strong>10 on <strong>Form</strong> <strong>20</strong>-F<br />

Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 81<br />

In addition to these CB&S positions, Postbank has exposure to European commercial mortgage-backed securities<br />

of € 192 million as well as residential mortgage-backed securities of € 428 million (which includes € 398 million in<br />

Europe, € 27 million in U.S). In addition, Postbank has exposure to non-corporate CDOs of € 69 million where the<br />

underlying assets include both commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities.<br />

These positions are mainly classified as loans and receivables and available for sale.<br />

The table also excludes both agency mortgage-backed securities and agency eligible loans, which we do not<br />

consider to be credit sensitive products, and interest-only and inverse interest-only positions which are negatively<br />

correlated to deteriorating markets due to the effect on the position of the reduced rate of mortgage prepayments.<br />

The slower prepayment rate extends the average life of these interest-only products which in turn<br />

leads to a higher value due to the longer expected interest stream.<br />

The various gross components of the overall net exposure shown above represent different vintages, locations,<br />

credit ratings and other market-sensitive factors. Therefore, while the overall numbers above provide a view of<br />

the absolute levels of our exposure to an extreme market movement, actual future profits and losses will depend<br />

on actual market movements, basis movements between different components of our positions, and our ability<br />

to adjust hedges in these circumstances.<br />

Ocala Funding LLC: We own 71.4 % of the commercial paper issued by Ocala Funding LLC (Ocala), a commercial<br />

paper vehicle sponsored by Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (TBW), which ceased mortgage<br />

lending operations and filed for bankruptcy protection in August <strong>20</strong>09. We classify the commercial paper as a<br />

trading asset and measure it at fair value through profit or loss. As of December 31, <strong>20</strong>10, the total notional<br />

value of the commercial paper issued by Ocala which was held by the Group was € 904 million. As a result of<br />

TBW filing for bankruptcy and based on information available at the time, we recognized a fair value loss of<br />

approximately € 350 million for <strong>20</strong>09 related to the Ocala commercial paper. On July 1, <strong>20</strong>10, additional information<br />

about the collateral held by Ocala was included in an Asset Reconciliation <strong>Report</strong> filed with the bankruptcy<br />

court with respect to the TBW estate. Based on this new information and certain management assumptions<br />

related to the eligibility of claims raised against the bankruptcy administrators, we recognized an additional fair<br />

value loss in the second quarter <strong>20</strong>10 of approximately € 270 million. In the third quarter <strong>20</strong>10, we recorded a<br />

further fair value charge of approximately € 90 million resulting in a fair value loss adjustment for <strong>20</strong>10 of approximately<br />

€ 360 million.<br />

Exposure to Monoline Insurers: The deterioration of the U.S. subprime mortgage and related markets has<br />

generated large exposures to financial guarantors, such as monoline insurers, that have insured or guaranteed<br />

the value of pools of collateral referenced by CDOs and other market-traded securities. Actual claims against<br />

monoline insurers will only become due if actual defaults occur in the underlying assets (or collateral). There is<br />

ongoing uncertainty as to whether some monoline insurers will be able to meet all their liabilities to banks and<br />

other buyers of protection. Under certain conditions (e.g., liquidation) we can accelerate claims regardless of<br />

actual losses on the underlying assets.<br />

The following tables summarize the fair value of our counterparty exposures to monoline insurers with respect<br />

to U.S. residential mortgage-related activity and other activities, respectively, in each case on the basis of the<br />

fair value of the assets compared with the notional value guaranteed or underwritten by monoline insurers. The<br />

other exposures described in the second table arise from a range of client and trading activity, including collateralized<br />

loan obligations, commercial mortgage-backed securities, trust preferred securities, student loans and<br />

public sector or municipal debt. The tables show the associated credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”) that we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!