29.06.2013 Views

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>EPIDEMIOLOGIC</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>ABUSE</strong>—Los Angeles County<br />

A Semiannual Update of Drug Abuse Patterns and Trends in<br />

Los Angeles County, California<br />

Beth Finnerty, M.P.H. 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Two main themes continue to characterize the Los<br />

Angeles County-level substance abuse situation in<br />

the current reporting period (through June 2004): (1)<br />

a relatively stable or mixed pattern for many drugs<br />

and (2) increasing patterns for a few drugs, specifically<br />

methamphetamine. Despite the facts that Los<br />

Angeles is a distribution hub, transshipment area,<br />

and final destination for most, if not all, major drugs<br />

of abuse and local residents have ready access to<br />

most, if not all, illicit drugs and many diverted pharmaceuticals,<br />

heroin, crack cocaine, methamphetamine,<br />

and marijuana continue to dominate substance<br />

use/abuse indicator data in Los Angeles. With regards<br />

to treatment admissions, slightly less than one<br />

in four individuals entering a substance abuse treatment<br />

and recovery program in Los Angeles County<br />

self-report a primary heroin problem. Although primary<br />

heroin admissions constitute the largest percentage<br />

of all treatment and recovery admissions,<br />

their lead over the other major substances, such as<br />

alcohol, cocaine, and methamphetamine, remains<br />

marginal. The proportion of cocaine/crack admissions<br />

remained stable at 18 percent, while admissions<br />

for primary methamphetamine problems climbed<br />

higher in early 2004 to 21 percent of all admissions.<br />

Once again, the Los Angeles HIDTA led all California<br />

HIDTAs in terms of clandestine methamphetamine<br />

laboratory seizures, accounting for more than<br />

one-half of the 331 seizures made in California in the<br />

first half of 2004. Despite the steady decline in the<br />

number of methamphetamine laboratories in Los<br />

Angeles County specifically and the Los Angeles<br />

HIDTA in general, California is home of the domestic<br />

methamphetamine ‘superlab.’ Eighty-three percent<br />

of the 30 superlabs seized within the United<br />

States in the first half of 2004 were located in California;<br />

56 percent of those were located in four<br />

Southern California counties: Los Angeles, San Bernardino,<br />

Orange, and Riverside. Drug prices and<br />

purities were relatively stable in the first half of 2004,<br />

with small changes occurring at the midlevel and<br />

retail level for certain drugs. Los Angeles Countylevel<br />

California Poison Control System major drug<br />

exposure calls in the first half of 2004 were dominated<br />

by cocaine/crack, methamphetamine/ampheta-<br />

96<br />

mine, ecstasy, and heroin. Furthermore, among prescription<br />

and over-the-counter medication-related<br />

exposure calls, benzodiazepines were the most frequently<br />

mentioned category, followed by opiates/analgesics<br />

and Coricidin HBP. Adolescent substance<br />

use data gathered from the California Healthy Kids<br />

Survey for the 2003–2004 school year illustrated that<br />

lifetime and past-month usage percentages among<br />

Los Angeles County secondary school students in<br />

grades 7, 9, and 11 were either the same or lower<br />

than percentages reported in previous school years.<br />

Aside from alcohol, students were most likely to report<br />

lifetime marijuana use (20 percent), followed by<br />

inhalants (13 percent), cocaine or methamphetamine<br />

(each at 7 percent), and LSD/other psychedelics or<br />

ecstasy (each at 6 percent). Indicator data for prescription<br />

drugs, PCP, LSD, MDMA (ecstasy), and<br />

GHB remained limited, but use and abuse are reported<br />

among some of the nontraditional indicators.<br />

INTRODUCTI<strong>ON</strong><br />

Area Description<br />

1 The author is affiliated with UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles, California.<br />

Los Angeles County has the largest population<br />

(9,871,506, 2003 estimate) of any county in the Nation.<br />

If Los Angeles County were a State, it would<br />

rank ninth in population behind California, New<br />

York, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio,<br />

and Michigan. Approximately 29 percent of California’s<br />

residents live in Los Angeles County. The<br />

population of Los Angeles County has increased 3.7<br />

percent since the 2000 Census. Nearly 90 percent of<br />

all Los Angeles County residents live within 88 incorporated<br />

cities; the remaining 10 percent reside in<br />

unincorporated areas of the county. The five most<br />

populated cities are, in descending order of population,<br />

Los Angeles (3,694,820), Long Beach (461,522),<br />

Glendale (194,973), Santa Clarita (151,088), and<br />

Pomona (149,473).<br />

Just over one-half of all Los Angeles County residents<br />

are female (50.6 percent) (exhibit 1). More than<br />

one-quarter (28.0 percent) are younger than 18; 10<br />

percent are older than 65. The racial and ethnic composition<br />

of Los Angeles County residents is quite<br />

diverse. Of those residents who report being of one<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, Vol. II, January 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!