NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>EPIDEMIOLOGIC</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>ABUSE</strong>—Los Angeles County<br />
A Semiannual Update of Drug Abuse Patterns and Trends in<br />
Los Angeles County, California<br />
Beth Finnerty, M.P.H. 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Two main themes continue to characterize the Los<br />
Angeles County-level substance abuse situation in<br />
the current reporting period (through June 2004): (1)<br />
a relatively stable or mixed pattern for many drugs<br />
and (2) increasing patterns for a few drugs, specifically<br />
methamphetamine. Despite the facts that Los<br />
Angeles is a distribution hub, transshipment area,<br />
and final destination for most, if not all, major drugs<br />
of abuse and local residents have ready access to<br />
most, if not all, illicit drugs and many diverted pharmaceuticals,<br />
heroin, crack cocaine, methamphetamine,<br />
and marijuana continue to dominate substance<br />
use/abuse indicator data in Los Angeles. With regards<br />
to treatment admissions, slightly less than one<br />
in four individuals entering a substance abuse treatment<br />
and recovery program in Los Angeles County<br />
self-report a primary heroin problem. Although primary<br />
heroin admissions constitute the largest percentage<br />
of all treatment and recovery admissions,<br />
their lead over the other major substances, such as<br />
alcohol, cocaine, and methamphetamine, remains<br />
marginal. The proportion of cocaine/crack admissions<br />
remained stable at 18 percent, while admissions<br />
for primary methamphetamine problems climbed<br />
higher in early 2004 to 21 percent of all admissions.<br />
Once again, the Los Angeles HIDTA led all California<br />
HIDTAs in terms of clandestine methamphetamine<br />
laboratory seizures, accounting for more than<br />
one-half of the 331 seizures made in California in the<br />
first half of 2004. Despite the steady decline in the<br />
number of methamphetamine laboratories in Los<br />
Angeles County specifically and the Los Angeles<br />
HIDTA in general, California is home of the domestic<br />
methamphetamine ‘superlab.’ Eighty-three percent<br />
of the 30 superlabs seized within the United<br />
States in the first half of 2004 were located in California;<br />
56 percent of those were located in four<br />
Southern California counties: Los Angeles, San Bernardino,<br />
Orange, and Riverside. Drug prices and<br />
purities were relatively stable in the first half of 2004,<br />
with small changes occurring at the midlevel and<br />
retail level for certain drugs. Los Angeles Countylevel<br />
California Poison Control System major drug<br />
exposure calls in the first half of 2004 were dominated<br />
by cocaine/crack, methamphetamine/ampheta-<br />
96<br />
mine, ecstasy, and heroin. Furthermore, among prescription<br />
and over-the-counter medication-related<br />
exposure calls, benzodiazepines were the most frequently<br />
mentioned category, followed by opiates/analgesics<br />
and Coricidin HBP. Adolescent substance<br />
use data gathered from the California Healthy Kids<br />
Survey for the 2003–2004 school year illustrated that<br />
lifetime and past-month usage percentages among<br />
Los Angeles County secondary school students in<br />
grades 7, 9, and 11 were either the same or lower<br />
than percentages reported in previous school years.<br />
Aside from alcohol, students were most likely to report<br />
lifetime marijuana use (20 percent), followed by<br />
inhalants (13 percent), cocaine or methamphetamine<br />
(each at 7 percent), and LSD/other psychedelics or<br />
ecstasy (each at 6 percent). Indicator data for prescription<br />
drugs, PCP, LSD, MDMA (ecstasy), and<br />
GHB remained limited, but use and abuse are reported<br />
among some of the nontraditional indicators.<br />
INTRODUCTI<strong>ON</strong><br />
Area Description<br />
1 The author is affiliated with UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles, California.<br />
Los Angeles County has the largest population<br />
(9,871,506, 2003 estimate) of any county in the Nation.<br />
If Los Angeles County were a State, it would<br />
rank ninth in population behind California, New<br />
York, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio,<br />
and Michigan. Approximately 29 percent of California’s<br />
residents live in Los Angeles County. The<br />
population of Los Angeles County has increased 3.7<br />
percent since the 2000 Census. Nearly 90 percent of<br />
all Los Angeles County residents live within 88 incorporated<br />
cities; the remaining 10 percent reside in<br />
unincorporated areas of the county. The five most<br />
populated cities are, in descending order of population,<br />
Los Angeles (3,694,820), Long Beach (461,522),<br />
Glendale (194,973), Santa Clarita (151,088), and<br />
Pomona (149,473).<br />
Just over one-half of all Los Angeles County residents<br />
are female (50.6 percent) (exhibit 1). More than<br />
one-quarter (28.0 percent) are younger than 18; 10<br />
percent are older than 65. The racial and ethnic composition<br />
of Los Angeles County residents is quite<br />
diverse. Of those residents who report being of one<br />
Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, Vol. II, January 2005