29.06.2013 Views

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

use has slowly increased over the last 8 years. In rural<br />

areas, methamphetamine appeared regularly in the<br />

treatment data, but methamphetamine has been identified<br />

as a problem in all parts of the State. The urban,<br />

street-level distributors in St. Louis deal in cocaine, so<br />

amphetamine use is not as widespread in the St. Louis<br />

area; this could indicate differences in dealing networks<br />

and access to locally produced drugs (“mom and pop”<br />

local production). However, an increase in availability<br />

and purity of Mexican methamphetamine and a growth<br />

in Hispanic groups in the St. Louis metropolitan area<br />

may change this trend. An increase in treatment admissions<br />

may signal this change. Cocaine and methamphetamine<br />

use have been split along racial lines in<br />

the State. While the number of methamphetamine<br />

treatment admissions was still relatively low in St.<br />

Louis (752 in 2003), in rural treatment programs,<br />

methamphetamine was the drug of choice after alcohol.<br />

The Midwest Field Division of the DEA decreased its<br />

cleanup of clandestine methamphetamine labs after<br />

training local enforcement groups; 2,860 labs were<br />

reported for 2003. The intensity of these law enforcement<br />

efforts is based on the availability of funds<br />

for local police departments to clean up box labs under<br />

Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS)<br />

funding. Thefts of anhydrous ammonia continued to<br />

be identified as an issue in rural areas.<br />

In the new methamphetamine scene, Hispanic traffickers,<br />

rather than the old network of motorcycle<br />

gangs, are the predominant distributors. Shipments<br />

from “super labs” in the Southwest are trucked in via<br />

the interstate highway system. This network is in<br />

contrast to the local “mom and pop” labs that produce<br />

personal quantities for family and friends. These local<br />

labs tend to use the Nazi method of production,<br />

with an output of 60 percent of the quantity of the<br />

starting products. Purity of the drugs produced by<br />

these labs and percent of finished product depends on<br />

the experience/attentiveness of the “cooker.” Most of<br />

the available methamphetamine is produced in Mexico<br />

and trafficked through these Hispanic traffickers.<br />

While much of the resources and personnel are directed<br />

at the local production, the actual quantity of<br />

methamphetamine that is available is through these<br />

Hispanic organizations. As the purity increases<br />

through these groups, less priority may be placed on<br />

local production. Some crystallized methamphetamine<br />

has been noted in the local market, usually indicating<br />

increased purity in the product.<br />

Locally produced methamphetamine purity fluctuated<br />

between 70 and 80 percent, while methamphetamine<br />

from Mexico has historically been only 20–30 percent<br />

pure (exhibit 1b). Increased crystalline product indicates<br />

higher purity, and the term “ice” has been applied<br />

<strong>EPIDEMIOLOGIC</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>ABUSE</strong>—St. Louis<br />

to all methamphetamine with this crystalline appearance.<br />

Methamphetamine sold for $700–$1,300 per<br />

ounce in St. Louis and for as little as $100–$120 per<br />

gram in some areas, reflecting a slight increase in price<br />

over the past year.<br />

Use of methamphetamine and its derivatives has become<br />

more widespread among high school and college<br />

students, who do not consider these drugs as<br />

dangerous as others. Because methamphetamine is so<br />

inexpensive and appeals to a wide audience, it is<br />

likely that its use will continue to spread.<br />

Depressants<br />

The remaining few private treatment programs often<br />

provide treatment for benzodiazepine, antidepressant,<br />

and alcohol abusers. Social setting detoxification has<br />

become the treatment of choice for individuals who<br />

abuse these substances. Since many of the private<br />

treatment admissions are polysubstance abusers, particular<br />

drug problems are not clearly identified.<br />

Hallucinogens<br />

Over the years, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) has<br />

sporadically reappeared in local high schools and<br />

rural areas. Blotters sell for $5–$7 per 35-microgram<br />

dose (exhibit 1b). Much of this LSD is imported from<br />

the Pacific coast. DAWN data in 2004 showed a<br />

small number of cases: 19.<br />

Phencyclidine (PCP) has been available in limited<br />

quantities in the inner city and has generally been<br />

used as a dip on marijuana joints. While PCP is not<br />

seen in quantity, it remains in most indicator data,<br />

including ED mentions, police exhibits, and as a secondary<br />

drug in ME data. Most of the users of this<br />

drug in the inner city are African-American. The unweighted<br />

PCP ED reports in 2004 totaled 23.<br />

Club Drugs<br />

Unweighted DAWN ED data for 2004 show few reports<br />

of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)<br />

—only 24. Reports of other club drugs were almost<br />

non-existent; two ketamine and two gamma hydroxybutyrate<br />

(GHB) reports were cited in 2004.<br />

While MDMA remained available at dance parties<br />

and cost $20–$30 per tablet, the popularity of the<br />

drug seems to be declining. Most of the reports about<br />

MDMA abuse are anecdotal or are part of a polydrug<br />

user’s history. Public treatment programs reported no<br />

admissions for MDMA. The private treatment programs<br />

that were queried reported MDMA as part of a<br />

polydrug abuser’s history in less than 10 percent of<br />

their treatment admissions.<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, Vol. II, January 2005 215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!