29.06.2013 Views

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that targets young injection drug users (IDUs)<br />

and their parents. Participants are aged 18–25<br />

and have injected in the last 6 months (n=547 as<br />

of December 2004). All data from the Family<br />

Process Study are preliminary. Current noninjecting<br />

heroin users (NIHUs) age 16–30 were<br />

recruited for the NIDA-funded NIHU Study to<br />

evaluate the rate of transition to injecting and<br />

drug and sexual practices associated with HIV,<br />

hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV) infections<br />

(n=618 as of June 2004).<br />

• Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)<br />

and HIV data were derived from both agency<br />

sources and UIC studies. IDPH and CDPH surveys<br />

provided statistics on AIDS and HIV<br />

through October 2004 and December 2003, respectively.<br />

The CDPH Office of HIV/AIDS Surveillance<br />

provided data through 2003 (2003 data<br />

are preliminary). CDC’s “HIV/AIDS Surveillance<br />

Report,” December 2001, provided additional<br />

data on HIV and AIDS. The agency data<br />

are complemented by UIC’s studies of IDUs<br />

conducted by COIP at UIC’s School of Public<br />

Health. One is the NIDA-funded “AIDS Intervention<br />

Study,” based on a panel of IDUs participating<br />

from 1988 to 1996. The second is the<br />

CDC-funded HIV Incidence Study (CIDUS I and<br />

II). The CIDUS data are from analyses of a<br />

1994–1996 study of 794 IDUs, age 18–50, in<br />

Chicago (Ouellet et al. 2000) and a 1997–1999<br />

study of 700 IDUs, age 18–30, in Chicago and<br />

its suburbs (Thorpe et al. 2000; Bailey et al.<br />

2001). Most sources have not been updated since<br />

the Chicago CEWG December 2002 report.<br />

As noted above, many of the sources traditionally<br />

used for this report have not been updated by their<br />

authors or were unavailable at the time this report<br />

was generated. Because some information has not<br />

changed—and to avoid redundancy—this report occasionally<br />

refers readers to a previous Chicago<br />

CEWG report for more information in a particular<br />

area. For a discussion of the limitations of survey<br />

data, the reader is referred to the December 2000<br />

Chicago CEWG report.<br />

<strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>ABUSE</strong> PATTERNS AND TRENDS<br />

This report of drug abuse patterns and trends is organized<br />

by major pharmacologic categories. Readers<br />

are reminded, however, that multidrug consumption<br />

is the normative pattern among a broad range of substance<br />

abusers in Chicago. Various indicators suggest<br />

that drug combinations play a substantial role in drug<br />

use prevalence. The latest DAWN data show that 18<br />

percent of all reported ED drug mentions in Chicago<br />

<strong>EPIDEMIOLOGIC</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>ABUSE</strong>—Chicago<br />

between July and December 2002 were alcohol-incombination<br />

mentions, similar to previous reporting<br />

periods for Chicago and comparable to proportions in<br />

nationwide reports.<br />

According to DAWN ED data, Chicago was reporting<br />

the highest ED drug mentions among the 21<br />

DAWN sites between 2000 and 2002. Both DAWN<br />

mortality cases and CDPH death certificates suggest<br />

that total drug-related deaths have remained stable at<br />

high numbers between 2000 and 2002. According to<br />

APORS, 718 children in Chicago were exposed to<br />

some drug at birth in 2002, which corresponds to an<br />

annual rate of 150 exposures per 10,000 live births.<br />

Cocaine/Crack<br />

The majority of quantitative and qualitative cocaine<br />

indicators suggest that use remains stable at high levels<br />

and that cocaine continues to be a serious drug<br />

problem for Chicago and Illinois.<br />

In 2002, both the DAWN ME drug-induced or drugrelated<br />

death data and CDPH death certificate data<br />

showed that cocaine remains a factor in more deaths<br />

in the Chicago area than any other illicit drug. However,<br />

multiple-drug use was involved in 65 percent of<br />

these cases.<br />

In 2002, ED mentions for cocaine remained at high<br />

levels, and they represented a 52-percent increase<br />

over 10,702 mentions in 1995. Chicago continued to<br />

have the most cocaine ED mentions among DAWN<br />

sites in 2002 (16,227 mentions) and the highest rate<br />

of mentions (275 per 100,000 population) (exhibit 1).<br />

Preliminary data accessed from DAWN Live! for<br />

2003 and 2004 show that slightly more than one-third<br />

of total ED reports were cocaine related (34 and 36<br />

percent, respectively). In 2004, the majority of the<br />

cocaine reports involved males (66 percent), African-<br />

Americans (57 percent), and those between 30 and 54<br />

years of age.<br />

According to the Illinois Poison Center, approximately<br />

120 cocaine-related calls have been received<br />

annually in Chicago for the past 3 years (2001–2003).<br />

During this period, cocaine generated more calls than<br />

any other “street drug” (approximately 25 percent of<br />

all “street drugs”).<br />

The FY 2003 Illinois drug treatment report indicates<br />

that cocaine abuse remained one of the most frequent<br />

reasons for entering treatment (excluding primary<br />

alcohol-only abuse) (exhibit 2). A total of 33,882<br />

persons were treated for cocaine-related problems in<br />

Illinois during FY 2003, of which nearly one-half<br />

occurred in Chicago. Cocaine was the most com-<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, Vol. II, January 2005 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!